Skip to main content

Security report for famedollars.com

Gamma Entertainment Inc. · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Gamma Entertainment Inc. operates the Fame Dollars adult affiliate program, targeting affiliate marketers in the adult entertainment industry. The website promotes a revenue-sharing model with payouts and access to multiple well-known adult content brands. Technically, the site uses legacy JavaScript libraries and standard tracking tools like Google Analytics and Tag Manager, but lacks modern security headers and has mixed content issues. Security posture is moderate with risks from outdated libraries and missing HTTPS enforcement on all resources. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, impacting overall trust. Strategic improvements in security, privacy compliance, and domain registration transparency are recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching famedollars.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
45
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business is positioned as a significant player in adult affiliate marketing, leveraging strong brand partnerships and a long operational history. Revenue streams come from affiliate commissions and rev-share models. The target audience is adult content webmasters and marketers. The company ecosystem includes multiple partner sites and a dedicated stats subdomain. Growth potential depends on maintaining brand reputation and improving technical and security standards. The lack of visible contact information and domain registration transparency could hinder trust and partner confidence.

Security posture

Current security maturity is moderate but with notable gaps. The use of outdated jQuery versions exposes the site to known vulnerabilities. Mixed content loading HTTP scripts on an HTTPS site risks user data interception. No advanced security headers or CSP policies are detected. Privacy compliance is basic with no cookie consent mechanism. Incident response and security policy information are absent. The domain WHOIS data absence is a critical trust issue. Overall, the security posture requires urgent upgrades to libraries, HTTPS enforcement, and transparency improvements.

Recommendations

  1. Upgrade all JavaScript libraries to current secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Ensure all external resources are loaded over HTTPS to prevent mixed content issues.
  3. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Add a visible cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations and improve user trust.
  5. Clarify domain registration details and ensure WHOIS data is publicly available or justified by privacy protection.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Gamma Entertainment Inc.
Description
FameDollars is an adult affiliate program powered by Gamma Entertainment Inc., offering affiliate marketing opportunities with payouts, promoting high quality adult content from well-known brand names.
Key services
Affiliate program with $35 per signup, 50% revenue share, Promotion of multiple adult content brand sites
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.4.2, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, SWFObject, prettyPhoto jQuery plugin
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Analytics scripts asynchronously

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Facebook Like Button, Twitter Share Button
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.
  2. WHOIS data is missing, indicating possible domain registration issues or privacy protection.
  3. Website promotes adult affiliate marketing with multiple well-known partner sites.
  4. Use of outdated JavaScript libraries and some HTTP resources present security risks.
  5. Privacy and terms pages are present but cookie policy and consent mechanisms are missing.
  6. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on the main page.
  7. Social media integration includes Facebook and Twitter widgets.
  8. No visible security headers or advanced security policies detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses legacy jQuery 1.4.2 and common tracking tools like Google Analytics and Tag Manager. It lacks modern frameworks or CMS indications. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic but functional. The site structure is clear with consistent branding. Technical debt is evident in outdated libraries and mixed content. Hosting provider and CMS are not identified. Modernization opportunities include upgrading tech stack, improving security headers, and enhancing privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with famedollars.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review famedollars.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.