Fall Prevention Month is a Canadian non-profit awareness campaign focused on educating organizations and practitioners about fall prevention for adults and children. The website serves as a hub for resources, promotional materials, and community engagement to support fall prevention initiatives each November. It targets healthcare and community organizations across Canada, positioning itself as a national campaign with a clear public health mission.
Technically, the website employs a moderate technology stack including jQuery, Owl Carousel, and multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Constant Contact. The site is mobile optimized with good navigation and content quality, though some JavaScript libraries are outdated. The website uses HTTPS and implements cookie consent, but lacks explicit security headers and detailed security or incident response policies.
From a security perspective, the site demonstrates a reasonable posture with HTTPS and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, the absence of security headers and older libraries present moderate risks. The WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection, but the website's professional design, consistent branding, and external partnerships support its legitimacy. No signs of malicious or adult content were found.
Overall, the website is trustworthy and professionally maintained, with room for improvement in security best practices and transparency. Strategic recommendations include updating libraries, implementing security headers, and publishing clear security and privacy policies to enhance trust and compliance.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Email security
SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.
Critical
No email authentication configured
Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing
What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
Email delivery with an unlock code
Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
68
Average
51
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention fallpreventionmonth.ca, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for fallpreventionmonth.ca right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
Fall Prevention Month operates as a specialized non-profit entity focused on fall prevention awareness in Canada. Its market positioning is that of a national campaign collaborating with healthcare and community organizations. The business model centers on providing free educational resources, promotional materials, and community engagement tools to support fall prevention efforts. Revenue streams are likely grant or donation-based, though not explicitly stated. The target customer segments include healthcare practitioners, organizations working with adults and children, and community groups. The partnership ecosystem includes related fall prevention communities and a website design firm. Growth indicators include active social media presence and ongoing campaign activities. The organization maintains a focused operational scope with consistent branding and professional content.
Security posture
The website exhibits a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and cookie consent mechanisms are in place, indicating awareness of privacy and security requirements. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces the overall security posture. The use of older JavaScript libraries may expose the site to known vulnerabilities. No explicit incident response or security policy information is provided, which limits transparency and preparedness. Data protection practices appear basic, with no visible sensitive data exposure. Compliance with GDPR or other regulations is not clearly demonstrated. Overall, the security culture appears functional but could benefit from enhanced policies and technical controls.
Recommendations
Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to strengthen defense against common web attacks.
Update all JavaScript libraries and dependencies to their latest stable versions to mitigate vulnerabilities associated with outdated software.
Publish clear security and incident response policies on the website to improve transparency and preparedness for potential security incidents.
Enhance privacy compliance by providing detailed GDPR-related information and ensuring cookie consent mechanisms meet regulatory standards.
Regularly audit and monitor third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and improve user trust.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
Fall Prevention Month
Description
Fall Prevention Month encourages organizations to coordinate their efforts for a larger impact. Canadian organizations participate by planning initiatives and sharing evidence-based information on fall prevention.
Key services
Fall prevention awareness campaigns, Educational resources and promotional materials, Community engagement and event planning support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent
Technology
Stack
jQuery, Owl Carousel, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Twitter Universal Website Tag, Constant Contact, Instafeed.js, Ionicons, Google Fonts (Roboto)
Frameworks
Modernizr
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good
Security
Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
HTTPS enforced
Cookie consent mechanism implemented
No exposed sensitive data in HTML
Analytics and tracking
Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Twitter Universal Website Tag
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic
Advertising
Ad networks
Google AdWords, Twitter Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Twitter Universal Website Tag
Marketing tools
Constant Contact, ShareThis
Transparency
good
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high
Key observations
Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
No WHOIS data available from CIRA, indicating privacy protection or unregistered domain
Content is focused on fall prevention awareness in Canada
Multiple social media and community links present
Cookie consent implemented with clear user interaction
No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage; contact form available
No terms of service or explicit security policies found
Use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools
No signs of suspicious or malicious content
Technical notes
Notes
The website is built using a combination of jQuery (version 2.2.1), Owl Carousel, and other JavaScript libraries such as Modernizr and Instafeed.js. It integrates multiple third-party services including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Twitter Ads, Constant Contact, and ShareThis for marketing and analytics purposes. The site uses Google Fonts and Ionicons for styling and icons. The HTML structure is valid with meta tags for SEO and social sharing (Open Graph). Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. Mobile optimization is good, and accessibility features are basic but present. No CMS is explicitly detected. Hosting provider details are not available from the provided data. Technical debt is indicated by older library versions and missing security headers, suggesting opportunities for modernization and improved security hardening.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with fallpreventionmonth.ca. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fallpreventionmonth.ca.