Skip to main content

Security report for fair-audit.de

FAIR AUDIT GmbH Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft · Finance · Germany

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FAIR AUDIT GmbH is a professional auditing and consultancy firm based in Hamburg, Germany, specializing in auditing, tax consultancy, reporting, and business consulting services for medium-sized companies across various industries. The company is positioned as a reliable and competent partner with a clear focus on client needs and transparency. Their affiliation with JPA International enhances their credibility and international reach. Technically, the website is built on a modern WordPress platform with popular plugins and frameworks, ensuring good performance and mobile optimization. Security measures include HTTPS, GDPR-compliant cookie consent, and Google reCAPTCHA integration, although explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not present. Overall, the website reflects a professional and trustworthy business with a solid digital presence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fair-audit.de

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets medium-sized enterprises in production, trade, and service sectors, offering comprehensive auditing and consultancy services. Their business model focuses on personalized, clear-sighted advice and compliance services, supported by a membership in JPA International, which suggests a networked approach to service delivery. The website content and structure indicate a stable, small-sized firm with a focus on quality and client trust. The presence of detailed service descriptions and legal notices supports transparency and regulatory compliance. The partnership with JPA International is a strategic asset enhancing market positioning.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with enforced HTTPS, integration of Google reCAPTCHA for form protection, and a GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanism. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and security headers indicates room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site uses up-to-date WordPress and plugin versions, reducing risk exposure. Recommendations include implementing security headers, publishing a security policy, and adding a vulnerability disclosure mechanism to enhance trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to harden security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page including incident response contacts to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Regularly audit and update all plugins and themes to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO metadata for improved user experience and search engine ranking.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FAIR AUDIT GmbH Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft
Description
FAIR AUDIT is an experienced accountancy and auditing practice based in Hamburg, Germany. They audit and advise medium-sized companies in production, trade, and service industries regardless of legal and tax structure. They offer annual audits, tax consultancy, reporting, and business consulting services.
Key services
Audit, Tax Consultancy, Reporting, Business Consulting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.7.1, WPBakery Page Builder, Slider Revolution 6.3.5, jQuery 3.7.1, Contact Form 7, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Moove GDPR Cookie Compliance plugin, Buttonizer
Frameworks
Wolf Framework 2.2.0
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA integration on forms
  • GDPR cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Buttonizer
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to auditing and consultancy services.
  3. GDPR compliance is implemented with cookie consent and privacy policy.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided with phone, email, and address.
  5. Technical stack is modern and uses popular WordPress plugins and frameworks.
  6. No security policy or incident response information explicitly found.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected.
  8. Website uses Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking with consent.
  9. Partner affiliation with JPA International is clearly indicated.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.7.1 using WPBakery Page Builder and Slider Revolution for content presentation. It employs jQuery 3.7.1 and integrates Google reCAPTCHA v3 for bot protection. GDPR compliance is managed via the Moove GDPR Cookie Compliance plugin. The site loads external scripts from trusted sources such as Google and Buttonizer for marketing tools. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, though some accessibility and security header enhancements could be made to improve overall robustness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fair-audit.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fair-audit.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.