Skip to main content

Security report for factaprofutura.com

Facta Pro Futura · Energy · Slovakia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Facta Pro Futura is a specialized strategic foresight platform focusing on understanding future trends and challenges, particularly in the energy sector and Central Europe. The website offers horizon scanning, data analysis, reports, and a geocalendar to support decision-makers in anticipating risks and opportunities. The platform collaborates with recognized partners such as the Adapt Institute, enhancing its credibility in the foresight domain. Technically, the website is built on the Webnode CMS, leveraging AWS Cloudfront CDN for content delivery, and demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and implements a cookie consent mechanism but lacks visible security headers and formal privacy or terms of service pages. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, although the active and professional nature of the site partially offsets this risk. Overall, the site presents a moderate security posture with room for improvement in compliance and transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, LinkedIn

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching factaprofutura.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in a niche foresight and strategic analysis market, targeting policy makers, strategists, and researchers interested in future developments, especially in energy and technology sectors. Its business model revolves around providing analytical content, reports, and data services to support strategic planning. The partnership with the Adapt Institute and presence on professional social media platforms indicate a growing ecosystem and potential for influence in Central Europe. The company appears small but focused, with a consistent brand and quality content. Revenue streams likely include report sales, subscriptions, or consultancy services. The lack of explicit contact information and formal policies may limit trust among some stakeholders.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly enforced, and a cookie consent banner with advanced settings is implemented, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces protection against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are provided, which could hinder timely security incident management. The lack of privacy and terms of service pages also suggests incomplete compliance with GDPR and related frameworks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected, but continuous monitoring and improvements are recommended to enhance security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add essential security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, HSTS) to strengthen web security.
  3. Publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure contacts to facilitate security communication.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration to ensure transparency and legitimacy.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and maintain up-to-date libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Facta Pro Futura
Description
Facta Pro Futura is a strategic foresight platform focused on understanding and exploring future developments to help avoid risks and seize opportunities. It offers horizon scanning, analyses, data, reports, and a geocalendar, with a focus on topics such as drone technology and energy infrastructure.
Key services
Horizon Scanning, Analyses & Information, Data, Geocalendar, Blog and foresight content
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Cloudfront CDN, Webnode platform
Platforms
Webnode
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on strategic foresight and energy infrastructure topics.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on the public pages.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with advanced settings.
  5. No privacy policy or terms of service pages detected.
  6. WHOIS data is unavailable or domain is unregistered, which is unusual for an active site.
  7. Social media presence includes LinkedIn and X (Twitter).
  8. Website uses Webnode CMS and AWS Cloudfront CDN for hosting and delivery.
  9. No visible security headers detected; HTTPS is enforced.
  10. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the Webnode CMS platform, utilizing AWS Cloudfront CDN for efficient content delivery. It employs modern web standards including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata including Open Graph tags. Performance is moderate, with some CSS files loaded conditionally and use of container query polyfills indicating modern layout techniques. However, accessibility features are basic, and no advanced frameworks or libraries were detected. The technical infrastructure supports the business goals but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and improved accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with factaprofutura.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review factaprofutura.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.