Skip to main content

Security report for fachzeitungen.de

Fachzeitungen.de · Media · Germany

Partial score · DNS & email only

51/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fachzeitungen.de operates as an independent German-language portal specializing in the aggregation and presentation of specialist magazines, Fachpublikationen, and eBooks across a wide range of professional and hobbyist categories. The platform offers categorized listings, search functionality, advertising opportunities, and a press release portal, targeting professionals and enthusiasts seeking specialized publications. The website is well-structured with clear navigation and a consistent brand presence, serving a niche media market in Germany. Technically, the site is built on Drupal CMS, employs Matomo for privacy-respecting analytics, and uses modern JavaScript libraries such as Owl Carousel and Tarteaucitron.js for cookie consent management. The site is mobile-optimized and implements HTTPS, but lacks some advanced security headers and explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is strong with a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism. However, no direct contact information or incident response channels are publicly visible, which could be improved for trust and compliance. WHOIS data is minimal, limiting full domain trust assessment but no suspicious patterns are evident. Overall, Fachzeitungen.de presents a professional and trustworthy media portal with room for enhanced security and transparency.

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fachzeitungen.de

This scan found 17 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Email security
50
DNS health
70
Network security
20
Average
51

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention fachzeitungen.de, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
4
Employees
0
Customers
4
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for fachzeitungen.de.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The portal holds a strong position in the German specialist media market by providing a centralized platform for discovering and subscribing to Fachmagazine and related publications. Its business model revolves around content aggregation, advertising, and publisher listings. The target audience includes professionals, academics, and hobbyists across diverse sectors such as architecture, health, technology, and culture. The site fosters community engagement through Fachbeiträge and blog listings. While the platform is small in size, it demonstrates consistent branding and a comprehensive content offering. Partnerships with related service providers and advertising networks support its revenue streams. Growth potential lies in expanding publisher partnerships and enhancing user engagement features.

Security posture

Fachzeitungen.de maintains a moderate security posture with HTTPS enforced and privacy-conscious analytics via Matomo. The presence of a cookie consent mechanism aligns with GDPR requirements. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of publicly available security or incident response policies indicate areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site does not provide a security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy, which could enhance transparency and trust. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for a content portal but could benefit from enhanced security controls and documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish explicit security and incident response policies, including a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  3. Enhance transparency by providing clear contact information for business and security inquiries.
  4. Regularly update Drupal core and modules to address potential vulnerabilities and maintain platform security.
  5. Improve accessibility features and conduct periodic audits to ensure compliance with accessibility standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fachzeitungen.de
Description
Fachzeitungen.de is an independent portal offering a comprehensive selection of magazines, eBooks, and specialist publications across numerous categories, providing information, samples, publisher details, and subscription options.
Key services
Comprehensive categorized listings of specialist magazines and publications, Search and discovery of Fachmagazine and eBooks, Advertising opportunities for publishers and related businesses, Press releases and Fachbeiträge (specialist articles) portal, Blog listings and community engagement
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal CMS, jQuery 1.12, Matomo Analytics, Tarteaucitron.js (cookie consent), Owl Carousel, FontAwesome, Google Adsense (disabled by default)
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Matomo for privacy-respecting analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense
Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Matomo Analytics, Tarteaucitron.js
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a comprehensive German portal for specialist magazines and publications.
  2. Content is well structured with extensive categorized listings.
  3. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented in compliance with GDPR.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage or main content.
  5. Use of Matomo analytics indicates privacy-conscious tracking.
  6. Advertising via Google Adsense is present but disabled by default until user consent.
  7. No security.txt or explicit security policy pages found.
  8. WHOIS data is minimal, limiting full domain trust assessment.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal CMS with a technology stack including jQuery 1.12, Owl Carousel for UI elements, FontAwesome for icons, and Tarteaucitron.js for cookie consent management. Matomo analytics is used for visitor tracking with privacy considerations. The site uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration. Performance is moderate with deferred and async loading of scripts. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design and viewport settings. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph data, and JSON-LD structured data for enhanced search engine understanding. The site could improve by adopting newer JavaScript frameworks and enhancing accessibility and security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fachzeitungen.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fachzeitungen.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.