Fachverband Holzenergie (FVH) im Bundesverband Bioenergie e.V. (BBE) and Fachagentur Nachwachsende Rohstoffe e.V. (FNR) · Energy · Germany
Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.
The Fachkongress Holzenergie website represents a well-established German industry event focused on wood energy and bioenergy. It serves as a key platform for knowledge exchange, networking, and showcasing innovations in sustainable energy derived from wood. The site is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and provides comprehensive event information targeting a broad range of stakeholders from industry professionals to policymakers and scientists. The business model centers on event organization and industry networking, positioning itself as a leading national congress with a 25-year history. Technically, the website is built on the Concrete5 CMS with modern frontend frameworks such as Foundation and jQuery. It employs Matomo analytics configured for privacy compliance and includes a cookie consent mechanism. While the site uses HTTPS and disables cookies in analytics, it lacks explicit HTTP security headers and published security policies, indicating room for security posture improvement. From a security perspective, the site shows good baseline practices with HTTPS and cookie consent but does not publish incident response or vulnerability disclosure information. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious elements were detected. The WHOIS data is minimal but consistent with the domain's purpose. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional, with a strong focus on privacy and compliance. Strategically, the site should enhance its security headers, publish a security policy and incident response contacts, and consider adding a vulnerability disclosure mechanism to strengthen trust and security maturity.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.
Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing
What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit
Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.
Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer
What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention fachkongress-holzenergie.de, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for fachkongress-holzenergie.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with fachkongress-holzenergie.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fachkongress-holzenergie.de.