Skip to main content

Security report for face.lv

Flirtic Llc · Media · Estonia

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Face.lv is a Latvian language social networking platform operated by Flirtic Llc, based in Estonia. The platform focuses on photo rating and social interaction, boasting a large user base exceeding 687,000 users and over 1.2 million images. It offers features such as user profiles, messaging, photo rating, horoscopes, and quizzes, targeting social network users interested in interactive photo-based engagement. The business model centers on user-generated content and social connectivity within a regional market. Technically, the website employs common web technologies including Bootstrap, jQuery, Google Analytics, Facebook SDK, and third-party marketing tools. Hosting is provided by ratesolutions.eu, and payment processing is handled by Maksekeskus, a trusted partner. Performance is moderate with a page load time of approximately 5 seconds and a page size of about 577 KB. Security posture is weak due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate, lack of HTTPS, missing security headers, and no modern TLS protocols enabled. Privacy compliance is partial with a privacy policy and terms of service present but no cookie consent mechanism despite active tracking scripts. Contact information is clearly provided, enhancing business credibility. Overall, the site is functional and professionally designed but requires urgent security improvements to protect user data and enhance trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching face.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
0
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention face.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
144
Employees
0
Customers
142
Third parties
2
Weak passwords
38%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for face.lv.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Face.lv holds a strong position as a regional social networking platform with a sizable user base and active engagement features. Its competitive advantage lies in its niche focus on photo rating and social interaction within the Baltic region. The business model leverages user-generated content and social connectivity, likely monetized through advertising and premium features. The partnership with Maksekeskus for payment processing indicates a structured revenue stream. The company operates under Flirtic Llc, an Estonian entity, with transparent contact details and domain registration. Growth indicators include a large number of users and images, and the presence of additional features like horoscopes and quizzes to increase user retention. The marketing ecosystem includes Google Analytics, Facebook, and ShareThis, supporting targeted advertising and user engagement. Strategic observations suggest the need to enhance security and privacy compliance to maintain user trust and comply with regulations.

Security posture

The current security maturity level of Face.lv is low due to critical issues such as the absence of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS, which exposes users to data interception risks. The lack of security headers and modern TLS protocols further weakens the security posture. However, the presence of SPF and a strict DMARC policy indicates good email security practices. There is no evidence of incident response policies or security certifications. Privacy compliance is partial with a privacy policy but no cookie consent mechanism, which may lead to GDPR non-compliance risks. The use of third-party analytics and marketing tools without explicit consent mechanisms increases privacy risks. Overall, the site requires immediate remediation of SSL/TLS issues, implementation of security headers, and enhancement of privacy compliance to reduce business risk and protect user data.

Recommendations

  1. Install and maintain a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Enable HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload options to enforce HTTPS.
  4. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with GDPR and inform users about tracking.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to avoid vulnerabilities.
  6. Develop and publish a security policy and incident response plan with clear contact channels.
  7. Improve accessibility features and SEO optimization for better user experience and reach.
  8. Consider obtaining relevant security certifications to enhance trust and credibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Flirtic Llc
Technical notes

Notes

Face.lv uses a standard web technology stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for DOM manipulation, and integrates multiple third-party services such as Google Analytics, Facebook SDK, and ShareThis for analytics and social sharing. The site is hosted on infrastructure managed by ratesolutions.eu, with DNS and email configurations properly set including SPF and DMARC. Performance is moderate with a page load time of approximately 5 seconds and a page size of 577 KB, which is acceptable but could be optimized. Mobile optimization is good due to Bootstrap usage. However, the lack of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols is a significant technical debt and security risk. The site lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features, and no CMS is explicitly detected. Payment processing is outsourced to Maksekeskus, indicating a modular approach to financial transactions. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but requires modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with face.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review face.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.