Skip to main content

Security report for f-i.de

Finanz Informatik GmbH und Co KG · Finance · Germany

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Finanz Informatik GmbH und Co KG is a leading digitalization partner for the Sparkassen-Finanzgruppe, one of Europe's largest financial groups. The company specializes in providing IT infrastructure, digital banking solutions, and process automation services tailored for financial institutions. Their website reflects a strong market position with comprehensive content, professional design, and clear communication channels targeting banking professionals and institutions. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript libraries, a CMS (Ibexa), and analytics tools while maintaining good performance and mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforcement and privacy compliance, though some improvements in security headers and incident response transparency are recommended. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the business identity, supporting legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching f-i.de

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
70
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention f-i.de, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
193
Employees
2
Customers
141
Third parties
50
Weak passwords
8%

Latest record dated 2026-06-01 · 20 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for f-i.de.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –mdm-traveler.f-i.de2026-06-01
  • –mdm-traveler.f-i.de2025-07-03

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates as an essential entity within the finance sector, focusing on B2B services for the Sparkassen-Finanzgruppe. Their business model revolves around delivering IT and digital solutions that enhance banking operations and customer experience. The website highlights key services such as AI platform development, customer portals, and digital banking enhancements. Partnerships with media outlets like FI-Magazin and use of cloud services for report hosting indicate a mature ecosystem. The firm demonstrates strong branding consistency and trust signals including certifications and awards, positioning itself as a reliable technology partner in the financial industry.

Security posture

Finanz Informatik exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent mechanisms in place. The absence of exposed sensitive data and use of asynchronous loading for analytics scripts reduce risk. However, the site lacks explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and does not publicly disclose an incident response contact or vulnerability disclosure policy, which are areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or suspicious patterns were detected in the content or WHOIS data. The overall security score is high but could be enhanced by adopting additional best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated incident response page or contact email to improve security transparency.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Create and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly review and update cookie and privacy policies to maintain GDPR compliance.
  5. Enhance monitoring of third-party scripts and analytics to minimize privacy risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Finanz Informatik GmbH und Co KG
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Finanz Informatik GmbH und Co KG
Description
Finanz Informatik is the digitalization partner of the Sparkassen-Finanzgruppe, providing technological and digital solutions including IT infrastructure, software products, and services for banking and finance.
Key services
IT infrastructure, Digital banking solutions, Customer portals, Process automation, AI platform development
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Swiper.js, FontAwesome, eTracker analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of async loading for analytics scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
eTracker
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
eTracker
Marketing tools
eTracker
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. Strong corporate branding and consistent design.
  3. Comprehensive navigation with clear menu structure.
  4. Multiple social media channels linked and active.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics.
  6. Presence of privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  7. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data.
  8. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and consistency.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Ibexa CMS platform, leveraging modern JavaScript frameworks and libraries such as Swiper.js and FontAwesome for UI components. Analytics are handled via eTracker with asynchronous script loading to optimize performance. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and accessibility features like skip links. SEO is supported through canonical links, meta tags, and Open Graph metadata. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in loading speed. No outdated or vulnerable libraries were detected. Hosting details are not explicit but cloud services are used for report hosting. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable web presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with f-i.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review f-i.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.