Skip to main content

Security report for ezerluki.lv

Ezerlūķi · Hospitality · Latvia

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

41/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ezerlūķi is a small hospitality business offering a holiday home rental located in Latvia near Zebrus lake. The website presents a well-structured and content-rich platform describing the accommodation, amenities, and surrounding recreational opportunities. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using popular plugins such as Yoast SEO and Elementor, with Google reCAPTCHA integrated for form security. The site is served over HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies, lack of explicit contact information, and missing security headers indicate areas for improvement in compliance and security posture. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain registration trust analysis. Overall, the site appears legitimate and professionally maintained but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ezerluki.lv

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
65
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
25
Average
41

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business targets families, couples, and nature enthusiasts seeking quiet and romantic holiday accommodation in the Zemgale region of Latvia. Its niche market position focuses on combining nature tourism with modern comfort and recreational activities such as fishing and cycling. The business model is straightforward holiday home rental without evident e-commerce or complex service offerings. The website content and structure support this model effectively, though the lack of contact details and policies may hinder trust and conversion. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the website content or linked domains.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and Google reCAPTCHA protecting forms. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps, particularly regarding GDPR. Incident response and security contact information are not provided, limiting readiness for security events. Regular updates and security hardening are recommended to maintain and improve security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add explicit contact information including emails and phone numbers for general and security-related inquiries.
  3. Configure and deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Establish an incident response contact channel (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email) and publish it on the site.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ezerlūķi
Description
Ezerlūķi is a holiday home located by the legendary Zebrus lake near Ezerlūķi hillfort in Dobele region. It is described as one of the most romantic and quiet places in Zemgale, suitable for family holidays with children, relaxing solitude, or creative work. The house has two bedrooms, two living rooms, a kitchen, and a bathroom with shower and sauna. It offers modern amenities including washing machine, dishwasher, and oven. There is a spacious shelter in the hay barn, a fire pit, a pier with a boat dock and sunbathing area by the lake. The surroundings offer excellent walking areas and interesting cultural and natural sites. Scenic cycling routes are available. Nearby are tennis and sports fields and a children's playground at the Niedras camping site (1 km away). Licensed fishing in the lake is possible. The location is 80 km from Riga, suitable for combining family vacation and work in Riga.
Key services
holiday home accommodation, sauna and recreational facilities, access to nature and cultural sites, licensed fishing
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Elementor, Contact Form 7, Sydney theme, Google reCAPTCHA
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google reCAPTCHA integration on forms

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based holiday home site with good content and SEO.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the homepage content.
  4. Uses Google reCAPTCHA for form security but no visible contact form on homepage.
  5. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrant info extracted.
  6. No security headers detected in provided data; HTTPS is enabled.
  7. No advertising or tracking beyond reCAPTCHA and Yoast SEO plugin.
  8. Content is safe and family-friendly.
  9. No signs of WAF or content blocking.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a contemporary and SEO-aware technical stack. Google reCAPTCHA integration enhances form security. The site loads scripts asynchronously, improving performance. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design and appropriate viewport settings. However, no hosting provider or CDN information was found. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement by optimizing images and scripts further. Accessibility features are basic, with some screen-reader text present but no advanced ARIA roles detected. SEO is well supported by meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ezerluki.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ezerluki.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.