Skip to main content

Security report for ezena.sk

Media · Slovakia

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

36/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

eZena.sk is an online women's lifestyle magazine primarily targeting Czech and Slovak speaking audiences. The website offers content related to lifestyle, health, fashion, beauty, family, and relationships, positioning itself as a regional media outlet. The business appears to be small-sized and founded in 2018, with a consistent branding and good content quality. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using the Newspaper theme, leveraging common web technologies such as jQuery and Google Analytics for tracking. Hosting is likely provided by blueboard.cz as indicated by the nameservers. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and DNSSEC enabled, though it lacks some advanced security headers and explicit privacy or cookie policies. No direct company contact information or security incident response details are provided, which limits transparency and user trust. Advertising is integrated via external ad networks, and user tracking is moderate through Google services. Overall, the site is professional and functional but could improve privacy compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ezena.sk

This scan found 32 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
36

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates in the media sector, focusing on women's lifestyle content. Its business model revolves around content publishing and advertising revenue. The target audience is women interested in lifestyle topics. The domain age and WHOIS data are consistent with the business claims, indicating legitimacy. The site links to multiple partner domains related to news and lifestyle, suggesting a networked ecosystem. However, the absence of explicit business contact details and privacy policies may affect credibility. Growth potential exists through enhanced compliance and security measures. The site uses standard web technologies and common analytics tools, reflecting a moderate digital maturity.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good baseline security posture with HTTPS enforced and DNSSEC enabled, reducing risks of interception and DNS spoofing. However, it lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Forms for login and password recovery exist but no explicit security measures like CAPTCHA or multi-factor authentication are evident. The absence of a vulnerability disclosure policy or incident response contact reduces preparedness for security incidents. Overall, the site is secure but could benefit from enhanced security best practices and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen defense against web attacks.
  3. Provide clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers to enhance business credibility.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program and incident response contact channels to improve security transparency and readiness.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization to improve user experience and search engine ranking.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Internetový magazín pro ženy, providing lifestyle, health, fashion, beauty, family, and relationship content targeted at women.
Key services
online magazine content, advertising
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, PHP, CSS3, HTML5
Frameworks
Newspaper WordPress Theme
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • DNSSEC enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Press Media
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Czech/Slovak language women's lifestyle magazine.
  2. Content is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. Uses WordPress CMS with Newspaper theme and common analytics tools.
  5. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML.
  6. Social media links are present but URLs are placeholders (#) or not clearly linked to company accounts.
  7. Security posture is good with HTTPS and DNSSEC but lacks advanced security headers.
  8. Advertising is present with external ad network banners.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information found.
  10. No data protection officer or certifications mentioned.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Newspaper theme, a popular choice for media sites. It uses jQuery and Google Analytics/Tag Manager for interactivity and analytics. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and uses modern CSS and HTML5 standards. Hosting appears to be managed by blueboard.cz, with DNSSEC enabled for DNS security. Performance is moderate, with some room for improvement in loading speed and accessibility. The site lacks advanced SEO meta tags and structured data beyond basic WordPress REST API links. Technical debt is minimal but could be reduced by updating scripts and improving security headers. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small media website but can be modernized further.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ezena.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ezena.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.