Skip to main content

Security report for exxxtrasmall.com

Teamskeet · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Teamskeet operates a large-scale adult entertainment platform specializing in original pornographic series, with a focus on niche markets such as petite and teen models. The site offers subscription-based access to exclusive video content and collaborates with other adult content creators to expand its offerings. Technically, the website leverages modern JavaScript frameworks like React and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools to optimize user engagement and advertising revenue. However, the site lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, and WHOIS data is unavailable, which impacts trust and compliance perceptions. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but no explicit security headers detected. Overall, the platform is professionally designed and content-rich but requires improvements in privacy compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching exxxtrasmall.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
55
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Teamskeet holds a strong position in the adult entertainment industry, targeting adult consumers interested in teen and petite adult content. Its business model relies on premium memberships and exclusive content access, supported by a network of partner sites. The company uses extensive tracking and advertising networks to monetize traffic. While the site is content-rich and professionally branded, the lack of public WHOIS data and privacy disclosures may pose challenges in regulatory compliance and user trust. Partnerships with other adult networks enhance its market reach and content diversity.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture with HTTPS usage but lacks visible security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries in the provided content. However, the absence of privacy policies and incident response contacts indicates gaps in compliance and security governance. The extensive use of third-party tracking scripts increases the attack surface and privacy risks. Enhancing security headers, publishing clear privacy and cookie policies, and establishing incident response channels would improve the security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  2. Publish clear and accessible privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details.
  3. Provide explicit contact information for security incidents and data protection inquiries.
  4. Audit and minimize third-party tracking scripts to reduce privacy risks.
  5. Obtain and publish WHOIS and business registration information to enhance trust and transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Teamskeet
Description
TeamSkeet is an adult entertainment network specializing in original pornographic series featuring models of various types, with this series focusing on petite and tiny teen models. The site offers premium memberships for access to exclusive content and collaborations with other adult content creators.
Key services
Adult video streaming, Premium membership access, Exclusive original series, Collaborations with other adult content creators
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React (React Helmet usage), Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, Convertexperiments, Async JavaScript loading
Frameworks
React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
PSMCode
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, Convertexperiments
Marketing tools
Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed adult entertainment platform.
  2. No WHOIS data available, indicating privacy protection or unregistered domain.
  3. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided content.
  4. Extensive use of third-party analytics and tracking scripts.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided.
  6. Content is explicit adult material targeting mature audiences.
  7. No security headers detected in provided data; HTTPS usage implied but not confirmed.
  8. Multiple external ad and tracking domains used.
  9. No visible forms or user input fields detected in the provided HTML snippet.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React framework with asynchronous loading of multiple analytics and marketing scripts such as Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, and Google Tag Manager. The site uses CDN-hosted assets for performance optimization. While the design is responsive and SEO optimized with structured data, the lack of detected security headers and privacy mechanisms indicates technical debt in security and compliance areas. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. The site would benefit from enhanced accessibility features and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with exxxtrasmall.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review exxxtrasmall.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.