Skip to main content

Security report for expresspizza.lv

ExpressPizza · Hospitality · Latvia

High risk. 5 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ExpressPizza is a Latvian pizza delivery service offering free delivery within 45 minutes. The website provides a user-friendly platform for ordering pizzas, snacks, and drinks online, with promotional sets and social login options to enhance customer experience. The business targets local consumers seeking quick and convenient food delivery. Technically, the website employs modern front-end technologies including Bootstrap, Tailwind CSS, jQuery, and integrates analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, and Cookiebot for consent management. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced, CSRF protection, and cookie consent mechanisms, though some security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is well addressed with a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent banner. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-optimized for its purpose.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching expresspizza.lv

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
83
Average
54
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the hospitality and retail sectors, focusing on online food delivery within Latvia. Its business model revolves around direct-to-consumer online ordering with promotional offers to attract customers. The presence of social login options and detailed cookie consent indicates a mature digital marketing approach. The website content and structure suggest a small-sized local business with a clear market position in the Latvian pizza delivery market. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified. The company maintains clear contact channels and demonstrates compliance with GDPR requirements, enhancing customer trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and CSRF tokens implemented. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, providing transparency and control to users. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are not detected and should be implemented to strengthen security. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the analysis. The absence of a security.txt file or explicit incident response contacts suggests room for improvement in vulnerability disclosure and incident management readiness. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small e-commerce food delivery site but could benefit from enhanced header policies and formalized incident response.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  3. Regularly update third-party libraries and frameworks to avoid known vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet broader compliance standards and improve user experience.
  5. Consider publishing terms of service and incident response policies to increase trust and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ExpressPizza
Description
ExpressPizza is a pizza delivery service offering free delivery within 45 minutes. The website provides information about pizza sets, individual pizzas, snacks, and drinks, targeting customers in Latvia.
Key services
Pizza delivery, Online ordering, Promotional pizza sets
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap 3.3.5, Bootstrap 5.1.3 CSS, Tailwind CSS v2, Swiper.js, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity, Cookiebot
Frameworks
Livewire (Laravel), Bootstrap, Tailwind CSS
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF token present in meta tag
  • Cookie consent management implemented
  • Use of XSRF-TOKEN cookie

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Meta Platforms, Inc. (Facebook), Google AdSense
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern front-end technologies and frameworks.
  2. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot with detailed cookie categories.
  3. Social login options available for user convenience.
  4. Clear contact information including phone and email provided.
  5. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  6. No security.txt or explicit vulnerability disclosure found.
  7. No terms of service page detected.
  8. Website content is in Latvian with language switcher for English and Russian.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of Bootstrap 3 and 5, Tailwind CSS, jQuery, and Swiper.js for UI components and responsiveness. It integrates Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Microsoft Clarity for analytics and marketing. Cookiebot manages cookie consent with detailed categorization. The site uses Laravel Livewire components indicating a Laravel backend. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. No CMS is explicitly detected. Hosting provider details are not available from the provided data.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with expresspizza.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review expresspizza.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.