Skip to main content

Security report for expedicnikamera.cz

Media · Czech Republic

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

42/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Expediční kamera is a Czech-based film festival specializing in documentaries about travel, adventure, and nature. Established in 2009, it has grown to become a recognized regional event with screenings at over 150 locations across the Czech Republic and Slovakia. The website serves as an information hub for the festival, providing film details, screening schedules, and partner links. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern web technologies including Google Analytics, Tag Manager, and MailerLite for marketing. The site is mobile-optimized and uses SEO best practices such as structured data. However, it lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, which are critical for GDPR compliance. Security-wise, HTTPS is enforced, but security headers are missing, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. Overall, the site is functional and professional but could improve in privacy compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of expedicnikamera.cz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching expedicnikamera.cz

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
42

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The festival operates as a niche media event targeting audiences interested in travel and adventure documentaries. Its business model revolves around event organization and collaboration with local co-organizers to host screenings. The long history and extensive network of screening locations position it well in the regional market. Partnerships with related outdoor and festival websites enhance its ecosystem. Revenue streams likely include sponsorships, ticket sales, and partnerships. The absence of detailed business registration info on the site suggests a focus on community and cultural engagement rather than commercial transparency.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS is properly configured, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No visible contact channels for security incidents or data protection officers are present, indicating limited incident response readiness. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics and MailerLite introduces potential risks if not regularly audited. The lack of privacy and cookie policies is a compliance gap under GDPR. Overall, the site is secure enough for informational purposes but requires enhancements to meet modern security and privacy standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against web vulnerabilities.
  3. Provide clear contact information for security incidents and designate a Data Protection Officer or responsible contact.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Improve accessibility features and provide more detailed business and legal information to enhance trust and professionalism.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Film festival focused on documentaries about travel, adventure, and wild nature. The 15th edition took place in 2025 with screenings across more than 150 locations in Czech Republic and Slovakia.
Key services
Film screenings, Festival organization, Collaboration with local co-organizers, Promotion of travel and adventure documentaries
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Google Fonts, Leaflet.js (map), MailerLite (email marketing), Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Analytics asynchronously

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
MailerLite
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a well-established regional film festival platform.
  2. Content is primarily in Czech language.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. Good use of SEO structured data and social media integration.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the main page.
  6. Multiple external partner domains linked in the top menu.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and asynchronous loading of analytics scripts.
  8. No visible security headers detected in the HTML content.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  10. No business registration or legal entity information explicitly stated.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a custom theme and uses popular plugins like Yoast SEO for search engine optimization. It integrates Google Fonts, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and MailerLite for marketing and analytics. The site features an interactive map using Leaflet.js with map tiles from api.mapy.cz. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO is enhanced by structured JSON-LD data. However, the site lacks advanced security headers and explicit privacy controls. Hosting appears to be with Tele3 based on nameservers. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but could benefit from security and privacy enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 42/100High36 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with expedicnikamera.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review expedicnikamera.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.