Skip to main content

Security report for exonicus.com

Exonicus, Inc. · Healthcare · United States

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Exonicus, Inc. is a specialized healthcare technology company focused on delivering advanced XR (Extended Reality) simulation platforms for combat and emergency medical training. Their flagship product, the Exonicus Trauma Simulator™, leverages dynamic physiology engines to provide realistic, self-guided medical training without reliance on instructors or specific hardware constraints. The company targets combat medics, emergency responders, and medical training institutions, positioning itself as an innovative leader in XR medical education with strategic partnerships such as with the US Madigan Army Medical Center. The business operates primarily through B2B sales, bundling software with Meta Quest 3 devices for rapid deployment. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern SEO and marketing tools including Yoast SEO and HubSpot analytics. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and moderate performance. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanisms, though lacks explicit security policies and incident response information. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, the website reflects a professional and trustworthy digital presence with strong content quality and business credibility. The domain registration data aligns well with the company’s history and operations, supporting legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security transparency by publishing security policies and incident response contacts, implementing security headers, and adding a vulnerability disclosure policy to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching exonicus.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
95
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Exonicus operates in the niche intersection of healthcare and technology, focusing on XR-based medical training solutions. Their competitive advantage lies in offering dynamic, instructor-independent trauma simulation accessible anytime and anywhere, which is a significant innovation over traditional training methods. Revenue streams likely derive from hardware-software bundles and institutional licensing. The company maintains a small but expert team and has cultivated partnerships with military medical centers and foundations, enhancing credibility and market reach. Growth indicators include recent content updates and active marketing via HubSpot. The partnership ecosystem includes notable military and healthcare organizations, positioning Exonicus well for expansion in defense and emergency medical training sectors.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. The website uses HTTPS and implements GDPR-compliant cookie consent, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure mechanism represents gaps in security transparency and readiness. No security headers were detected in the provided data, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. The use of third-party scripts like HubSpot requires ongoing vigilance to prevent supply chain risks. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business scale but would benefit from formalized policies and enhanced technical controls to mitigate risks and demonstrate compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  2. Implement and verify HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to minimize supply chain risks.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Exonicus, Inc.
Description
Exonicus enhances medical training with cutting-edge XR simulation technologies. Empowering combat medics and emergency responders to save lives using advanced virtual and mixed reality solutions. Expand your training capacity and prepare for emergencies with Exonicus.
Key services
Exonicus Trauma Simulator™, MilExTS MR training content, XR medical training platforms, Training software preloaded on Meta Quest 3 devices
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery 3.7.1, HubSpot scripts, Meta Quest 3 (hardware integration)
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web, XR (Extended Reality)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • GDPR consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security-related HTTP headers unknown (not provided)

Analytics and tracking

Services
HubSpot Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
HubSpot Analytics
Marketing tools
HubSpot collected forms, HubSpot cookie banner
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is rich, professionally presented, and relevant to XR medical training.
  3. Strong use of structured data and SEO best practices.
  4. Contact information is available via email and a detailed contact form with GDPR consent.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  6. Use of HubSpot for analytics and marketing automation is evident.
  7. No terms of service page detected.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by WordPress 6.8.2, utilizing Yoast SEO for search optimization and HubSpot for marketing automation and analytics. The tech stack includes jQuery and custom scripts for UI interactions. Hosting is inferred to be with GoDaddy.com, LLC based on registrar and DNS information. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness and SEO metadata well implemented. Structured data in JSON-LD format enhances search engine understanding. Technical risks include reliance on multiple external scripts which require monitoring for vulnerabilities. There is an opportunity to improve security headers and accessibility compliance to reduce technical debt and enhance operational resilience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with exonicus.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review exonicus.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.