Skip to main content

Security report for exchanger.money

Exchanger.Money · Finance · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Exchanger.Money operates as a peer-to-peer currency exchange platform specializing in WebMoney and various electronic payment systems, including cryptocurrencies. The platform emphasizes secure transactions through escrow protection and offers over 100 payment methods, targeting users within the WebMoney ecosystem and those seeking flexible currency exchange options. The website is primarily in Russian and presents a professional, user-friendly interface with clear navigation and modern design elements. Technically, the site leverages Vue.js and modern JavaScript modules, with Google Tag Manager integrated for analytics. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protection enabled, though improvements are needed in DNS security and HTTP security headers. Privacy compliance is partial, lacking cookie consent mechanisms and explicit GDPR indicators. Overall, the platform demonstrates a moderate to good level of digital maturity and business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching exchanger.money

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention exchanger.money, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for exchanger.money right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business positions itself as a niche exchange service within the financial technology sector, focusing on WebMoney users and cryptocurrency traders. Its peer-to-peer model with escrow reduces intermediary risks and commissions, appealing to cost-conscious users. The presence of partner exchanges like INDX and Cryptex indicates a collaborative ecosystem. The business model relies on facilitating direct trades between users, generating revenue likely through optional fees or payment system charges. The absence of direct contact information and limited transparency on security policies may impact user trust. Growth potential exists through expanding payment methods and enhancing compliance. The platform's longevity since 2016 supports market stability.

Security posture

Security measures include HTTPS enforcement, domain transfer lock, and escrow-based transaction protection, which collectively mitigate common risks in currency exchange platforms. However, the lack of DNSSEC, missing security headers, and absence of published incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies represent gaps. No contact channels for security incidents were found, limiting incident response readiness. The platform does not display cookie consent or privacy banners, which may expose it to regulatory risks under GDPR. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with standard best practices and transparency enhancements.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security HTTP headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add a visible cookie consent banner and privacy policy updates to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information, including a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure page.
  5. Provide clear and accessible contact information to improve user trust and support capabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Exchanger.Money
Description
Обмен различных валют и титульных знаков системы WebMoney Transfer между ее участниками без посредников, с использованием более 100 платежных методов и поддержкой криптовалют.
Key services
Buying and selling WebMoney, Currency exchange
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript (ES Modules), CSS, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Vue.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Escrow protection for transactions

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is primarily in Russian with some English interface elements.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banners found, which may impact GDPR compliance.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the main page.
  5. Website uses modern JavaScript modules and Vue.js framework.
  6. Good use of escrow mechanism for transaction security.
  7. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page.
  8. WHOIS data shows domain is registered with EuroDNS S.A. and is valid until late 2025.
  9. Multiple payment methods and currencies supported including cryptocurrencies.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack with Vue.js and ES modules, ensuring a responsive and interactive user experience. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics, indicating some level of user behavior tracking. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO metadata including descriptive titles and keywords. Performance appears moderate, with no explicit indicators of slow loading but also no advanced performance optimizations detected. Accessibility is basic, with some semantic HTML but no explicit ARIA roles or accessibility features noted. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified, and no CMS is detected, suggesting a custom or static site deployment. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and security features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 68/100Medium28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with exchanger.money. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review exchanger.money.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.