Skip to main content

Security report for excelsior-hotel.cz

Excelsior · Hospitality · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Excelsior is a mountain hotel and wellness center located in the Moravian-Silesian Beskids in the Czech Republic. The business offers accommodation in hotel rooms and cottages, wellness and spa services including sauna and massages, event hosting for weddings and celebrations, and various activity packages targeting tourists, families, and couples seeking relaxation and nature experiences. The website is professionally designed using WordPress and Elementor, with multilingual support for Czech, English, and Polish. The technical infrastructure includes modern web technologies and Google Tag Manager for analytics. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacks important security headers and privacy compliance elements such as privacy and cookie policies. Contact information is clearly provided, enhancing business credibility. Overall, the website is functional and trustworthy but would benefit from improved privacy compliance and enhanced security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching excelsior-hotel.cz

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Excelsior positions itself as a regional hospitality provider specializing in mountain tourism and wellness. Its competitive advantages include a scenic location, comprehensive wellness offerings, and event hosting capabilities. The business model focuses on direct accommodation bookings, wellness services, and event management. The target customer segments include tourists seeking nature and wellness experiences, families, couples, and corporate clients for events. The website indicates a small-sized business with a stable domain age since 2007. The partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed, and no related or subsidiary domains were found. Growth indicators include active content updates and 3D virtual tours enhancing customer engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries was found. The use of Google Tag Manager introduces moderate user tracking, but no explicit privacy or cookie consent mechanisms are implemented, posing compliance risks under GDPR. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, indicating limited transparency in security governance. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and HSTS to strengthen web security.
  3. Introduce a cookie consent mechanism to obtain user consent for tracking and cookies.
  4. Regularly audit and update all WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider publishing incident response and security policies to improve transparency and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Excelsior
Description
Hotel Excelsior is a mountain hotel and wellness center located in the Moravian-Silesian Beskids, offering accommodation, wellness services, event hosting including weddings and celebrations, and various activity packages.
Key services
Accommodation in hotel rooms and cottages, Wellness and spa services including sauna, massages, hydrogen baths, Event hosting for weddings, celebrations, corporate events, Activity packages and tourism in Beskids region
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, Elementor 3.30.3, jQuery 3.7.1, Google Tag Manager, YouTube iframe API
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich
  2. No privacy or cookie policy pages found, which is a compliance gap
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with email and phone
  4. Multilingual support for Czech, English, and Polish
  5. Use of modern WordPress and Elementor technologies
  6. No explicit security policies or incident response information available
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
  8. No data protection officer contact found
  9. SSL is enabled but security headers are missing
  10. Google Tag Manager used for analytics and tracking
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 with Elementor 3.30.3, leveraging jQuery and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and uses modern CSS and JavaScript libraries. Performance is moderate, with some large images and embedded videos. The site lacks advanced SEO metadata beyond basic tags and does not include structured data like JSON-LD for business or product schema. Accessibility features are basic, with some ARIA attributes present but no explicit accessibility statements. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Technical risks include missing security headers and potential privacy compliance gaps.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with excelsior-hotel.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review excelsior-hotel.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.