Skip to main content

Security report for ewf-fotowettbewerb.de

Waldeckische Landeszeitung · Energy · Germany

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.ewf-fotowettbewerb.de serves as a localized platform for a photo competition organized by the energy company EWF in partnership with the Waldeckische Landeszeitung newspaper. It targets residents within the EWF supply area to submit photos of unique or old electrical appliances, fostering community engagement and brand awareness. The site is built on the Khuris CMS and hosted on iossol.de nameservers, reflecting a small-scale but functional technical infrastructure. The content is primarily in German and well-aligned with the campaign's goals, featuring clear navigation and a cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR requirements. From a security perspective, the site lacks advanced security headers and explicit incident response policies, which limits its security posture. No contact emails or phone numbers are provided, which may affect user trust and support accessibility. The cookie consent banner is implemented effectively, offering users control over essential and statistical cookies. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, and the site content is fully accessible and safe for general audiences. Overall, the website demonstrates moderate digital maturity with room for improvement in security practices, accessibility, and contact transparency. The domain WHOIS data is minimal but consistent with a legitimate local campaign site. Strategic enhancements in security headers, incident response disclosures, and contact information would improve trust and compliance. The site effectively supports its business objective of community engagement through a photo contest, leveraging partnerships with local media and energy providers.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ewf-fotowettbewerb.de

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
28
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention ewf-fotowettbewerb.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for ewf-fotowettbewerb.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website represents a niche marketing initiative by EWF, an energy supplier, in collaboration with the Waldeckische Landeszeitung newspaper. Its market positioning is local/regional, focusing on community interaction through a photo competition. The business model centers on brand engagement rather than direct sales, using prizes and online voting to stimulate participation. The target audience includes local residents and customers interested in photography and electrical appliances. The partnership ecosystem includes the local newspaper and the energy company, enhancing credibility and reach. Growth indicators are limited to the campaign duration and community involvement. The site lacks direct revenue streams but supports brand loyalty and awareness.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is basic. The website uses HTTPS (assumed but not explicitly confirmed), and a cookie consent mechanism is in place, indicating GDPR awareness. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting transparency and preparedness. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The lack of contact emails and phone numbers may hinder incident reporting and user support. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small campaign site but requires improvements to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish an incident response policy and provide clear security contact channels (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails).
  3. Add explicit company contact emails and phone numbers to improve user trust and support accessibility.
  4. Enhance mobile responsiveness and accessibility features to improve user experience and compliance.
  5. Regularly audit and update CMS and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain security hygiene.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Waldeckische Landeszeitung
Description
Website for the EWF photo competition "Schätzchen gesucht" organized by EWF and Waldeckische Landeszeitung, targeting participants to upload photos of old or original electrical devices from the supply area. The competition runs from September to November 2025 with prizes including Samsung Galaxy S10, E-Scooter, and air fryer.
Key services
Photo competition hosting, Online voting platform, Community interaction
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, JavaScript
Frameworks
Khuris CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a localized photo competition platform for an energy company and local newspaper.
  2. Content is in German and well-structured for the campaign.
  3. No explicit privacy or security policies beyond cookie consent and privacy policy link.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly listed on the page.
  5. No social media links detected.
  6. No terms of service found.
  7. No advanced security headers or incident response information found.
  8. Cookie consent banner is implemented with options for essential and statistical cookies.
  9. Website uses Khuris CMS and is hosted on iossol.de nameservers.
  10. No analytics or advertising scripts detected in the provided HTML.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Khuris CMS, with standard HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript technologies. It uses multiple CSS files and JavaScript scripts for functionality and cookie management. The hosting is managed via iossol.de nameservers, indicating a small to medium hosting provider. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility. SEO is basic with meta tags present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. No analytics or advertising scripts were found, suggesting minimal tracking. The site structure is clear with a main menu and footer containing partner links and legal information. Technical risks include lack of security headers and limited incident response visibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ewf-fotowettbewerb.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ewf-fotowettbewerb.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.