Skip to main content

Security report for everypay.gr

EVERYPAY · Finance · Greece

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

EVERYPAY is a Greece-based payment processing company offering a comprehensive payment gateway and marketplace payment solutions. The company is authorized and regulated by the Bank of Greece and holds PCI DSS Level 1 certification, positioning it as a trusted player in the financial technology sector. Their services cater primarily to businesses and developers seeking reliable and customizable payment acceptance solutions, including APIs and plugins for popular e-commerce platforms. The website reflects a mature digital presence with excellent design, mobile optimization, and clear navigation, supporting a positive user experience. Technically, the site leverages modern web technologies such as React and Next.js, ensuring fast performance and responsiveness. The presence of detailed developer documentation and sandbox API endpoints indicates a strong focus on developer enablement and integration ease. Security is robust, with HTTPS enforced, multiple security headers, and real-time anti-fraud transaction analysis. The company demonstrates compliance with privacy regulations through clear privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. No critical vulnerabilities or security issues were detected. However, the absence of a public incident response policy and security.txt file suggests areas for improvement in transparency and vulnerability management. Overall, the website and business exhibit a high level of professionalism, trustworthiness, and technical sophistication, suitable for their target market. Strategic recommendations include enhancing incident response transparency, publishing vulnerability disclosure channels, and maintaining continuous security audits to uphold trust and compliance standards.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching everypay.gr

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

EVERYPAY operates in the finance and technology sectors, focusing on payment gateway services and marketplace payment infrastructure. Their business model revolves around providing scalable, API-driven payment solutions to businesses and marketplaces, supporting integrations with major e-commerce platforms. The company serves a medium-sized market with over 17,500 companies and 50+ marketplaces enabled, indicating significant market penetration. Their client base includes reputable brands, enhancing their competitive advantage. Revenue streams likely include transaction fees, service subscriptions, and custom integration services. The company maintains a strong partnership ecosystem, evidenced by integrations and developer tools. Growth indicators include API request volumes exceeding 100,000 per day and expansion across 12 countries. Strategic observations highlight a focus on innovation, developer experience, and regulatory compliance as key differentiators.

Security posture

EVERYPAY demonstrates a mature security posture with PCI DSS Level 1 certification and regulatory oversight by the Bank of Greece. The website enforces HTTPS and implements multiple security headers, reducing common web vulnerabilities. Real-time transaction anti-fraud mechanisms indicate proactive risk management. Privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms align with GDPR requirements, supporting data protection compliance. However, the lack of a publicly available incident response policy and security.txt file limits transparency in vulnerability handling and incident management. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the website content. Overall, the security culture appears strong but could benefit from enhanced communication of security processes and dedicated incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a formal incident response policy and provide dedicated contact channels for security incidents.
  2. Implement and publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  3. Enhance transparency by detailing security frameworks and certifications on the website.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Provide clear contact information for the Data Protection Officer to strengthen GDPR compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
EVERYPAY
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
EVERYPAY
Description
Online payment processing for businesses offering easy to use solutions and APIs to accept credit, debit and prepaid card payments.
Key services
Payment Gateway, Marketplaces payment solutions, Email Payment, One Click Pay, Web Plugins, SoftPOS
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Node.js, REST API
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Real-time transaction anti-fraud analysis
  • PCI DSS Level 1 compliance
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Strong regulatory and certification trust signals.
  3. Comprehensive developer resources and API documentation.
  4. Clear contact information with multiple verified channels.
  5. Modern, performant, and mobile-optimized website design.
  6. Good privacy and cookie policy implementation with consent mechanisms.
  7. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including React and Next.js, enabling server-side rendering and fast client-side interactions. The use of REST APIs and sandbox environments supports developer engagement and integration flexibility. Performance is optimized with preloading of CSS and fonts, and mobile responsiveness is excellent. Accessibility features are present but could be further enhanced. SEO is well addressed with appropriate meta tags and structured content. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified, but the infrastructure supports fast loading times and scalability. Technical risks are minimal, with no visible deprecated or vulnerable components. Opportunities exist to improve technical documentation and monitoring for continuous performance and security improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with everypay.gr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review everypay.gr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.