Skip to main content

Security report for everyoneforclimate.org

everyone for climate Stiftung · Hospitality · Liechtenstein

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

everyone for climate Stiftung is a non-profit foundation dedicated to climate protection within the global hospitality industry. The organization partners with hotels to generate charitable donations called Climate Euros, supporting international climate protection organizations and raising environmental awareness among guests and hoteliers. The website is professionally designed, content-rich, and well-structured, targeting environmentally conscious stakeholders in the hospitality sector globally, with a focus on German-speaking audiences. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager and CookieHub for analytics and cookie consent management, and it demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy protection, which is typical for non-profit entities, and no suspicious patterns were detected. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and credible digital presence for a small-sized non-profit organization focused on sustainability.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching everyoneforclimate.org

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
68
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The foundation occupies a niche market position within the hospitality and sustainability sectors, leveraging partnerships with hotels to mobilize fundraising for climate initiatives. Its business model is based on coordinated fundraising and awareness campaigns rather than commercial sales. The target audience includes hoteliers, industry stakeholders, and eco-conscious travelers. The organization demonstrates growth potential through partnerships and community engagement. The website reflects a consistent brand identity and clear mission, supporting trust and credibility. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified. The foundation's operations appear transparent with accessible contact information and compliance with GDPR and cookie regulations.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, indicating baseline security and privacy awareness. However, it lacks visible HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published, limiting transparency in security management. The contact form collects personal data but appears to use secure submission methods (no explicit vulnerabilities detected). No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by implementing additional security headers, publishing security policies, and establishing incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen web security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate risks from external libraries.
  5. Enhance SSL/TLS configuration details and perform regular security assessments to maintain strong encryption standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
everyone for climate Stiftung
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
everyone for climate Stiftung
Description
everyone for climate is a non-profit foundation working with the global hospitality industry for climate protection. They partner with hotels to generate charitable donations called Climate Euros for international organizations working in climate protection, creating impact and increasing guest and hotelier eco-awareness.
Key services
Partnering with hotels, Generating charitable donations, Raising eco-awareness among guests and hoteliers
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, CookieHub, Modernizr, JavaScript, CSS
Frameworks
Massive Landing Page (custom or proprietary)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by canonical URLs)
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
CookieHub
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in German.
  2. Clear mission and business model focused on climate protection in hospitality.
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanism.
  4. Contact form and contact details provided with professional presentation.
  5. No security policy or incident response information published.
  6. WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating privacy protection.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  8. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  9. No social media links explicitly found in footer or header.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with modern front-end technologies including JavaScript frameworks and CSS, supported by Google Tag Manager and CookieHub for analytics and cookie management. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts to improve speed. No CMS or hosting provider details are explicitly detected. The site structure and meta tags support good SEO. There is no evidence of technical debt or outdated technologies. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and publish more comprehensive security documentation to reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with everyoneforclimate.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review everyoneforclimate.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.