Skip to main content

Security report for eversomusic.de

everso | Live music experience · Media · Germany

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

everso is a German-based live music experience provider offering an exclusive artist team of over 80 performers for successful events. The website targets event organizers seeking professional live music entertainment, positioning itself as a specialized service provider in the media sector. The business model revolves around artist booking and event services, with a focus on quality and exclusivity. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme, enhanced with multiple plugins for multilingual support, SEO, and interactive content. The site features modern multimedia elements such as video backgrounds and animations, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit privacy or incident response policies. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises legitimacy concerns, though the professional presentation and active content mitigate some risk. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from improved transparency and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching eversomusic.de

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the media and event entertainment sector, leveraging a curated artist network to serve event clients. Its competitive advantage lies in the exclusivity and size of its artist team. The business model is service-oriented, generating revenue through bookings and event packages. The multilingual website suggests targeting both German and international markets. The presence of Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel indicates active marketing and analytics efforts. However, lack of visible contact emails or phone numbers on the homepage may limit direct client engagement. No certifications or formal trust badges are displayed, which could be improved to enhance credibility. The company appears small in size with a focused niche market presence.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and uses reputable third-party scripts for analytics and cookie consent, reflecting baseline security awareness. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages were found, which is a compliance gap under GDPR. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting transparency in security management. The WHOIS data absence is a red flag for domain legitimacy and could indicate privacy protection or registration issues. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires enhancements in policy transparency, header implementation, and domain registration verification.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to strengthen site security.
  3. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure legitimacy and transparency.
  4. Add explicit incident response contact information and consider a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins for security vulnerabilities and performance impact.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
everso | Live music experience
Description
Erlebe deine live music experience. Erlebe everso – das exklusive Artist Team von über 80 KünstlerInnen für erfolgreiche Events.
Key services
Live music performances, Artist booking for events
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Divi Theme, jQuery, Yoast SEO, WPML (multilingual plugin), 3D Flipbook plugin, Supreme Modules Pro for Divi, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Clickskeks cookie consent
Frameworks
WordPress CMS
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel scripts loaded asynchronously

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich multimedia content
  2. No explicit privacy or terms of service pages found
  3. Cookie consent implemented via third-party service
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage; contact form present
  5. Use of modern WordPress theme and plugins
  6. No security headers detected in provided data
  7. WHOIS data missing, raising legitimacy questions
  8. No signs of adult or NSFW content
  9. Social media links not explicitly found in provided HTML
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS with the Divi theme, leveraging multiple plugins for enhanced functionality including multilingual support and SEO optimization. The use of video backgrounds and Lottie animations indicates a focus on rich user experience. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts and cookie consent mechanisms. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design elements and adaptive content. Accessibility features are basic and could be improved. No hosting provider information was detected. The site lacks advanced security headers and explicit privacy or compliance pages, which are technical debt areas. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but has room for modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with eversomusic.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review eversomusic.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.