Skip to main content

Security report for euroson2026.com

Polish Society of Ultrasound · Healthcare · Poland

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The EUROSON 2026 website serves as the official platform for the 36th Congress of the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology and the 17th Congress of the Polish Ultrasound Society, scheduled for June 2026 in Lublin, Poland. It provides comprehensive information about the event, including scientific committees, venue details, registration, and contact information. The target audience is primarily medical professionals and researchers specializing in ultrasound and radiology. The website's business model revolves around event promotion and participant engagement. Technically, the website employs modern web standards including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, with external resources such as Google Fonts and Slick Slider for UI components. The site is mobile-optimized with a responsive design and clear navigation, though accessibility features are basic. No CMS or hosting provider details are evident from the content. Performance is moderate with no critical errors detected. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and implements a cookie consent banner, indicating awareness of privacy regulations such as GDPR. However, no security headers or explicit security policies are published, and WHOIS data for the domain is unavailable, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy and trustworthiness. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy in content and design but would benefit from enhanced security practices and transparency regarding domain registration and incident handling. Monitoring domain registration status and adding security policies would improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching euroson2026.com

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
20
Email security
55
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
68
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention euroson2026.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for euroson2026.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

EUROSON 2026 positions itself as a niche, professional medical conference organizer focused on ultrasound in medicine. Its competitive advantage lies in its affiliation with reputable European and Polish ultrasound societies and its specialized target audience of medical professionals. The business model is event-centric, generating revenue likely through registrations and sponsorships. The website supports growth by providing detailed event information and facilitating participant engagement. Partnerships appear limited to professional societies; no commercial partners or payment processors are evident. The organization appears small in size, focused on a single major event. Strategic observations include the need for improved domain legitimacy verification and enhanced digital trust signals to support business credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented, reflecting basic GDPR compliance. However, the absence of security headers, security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates gaps in security best practices. The lack of WHOIS data for the domain is a significant concern, potentially impacting trust and raising questions about domain ownership transparency. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The site would benefit from implementing security headers, publishing a security policy, and establishing clear incident response channels to enhance security posture and compliance readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information on the website to increase transparency and preparedness.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve security communication.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure domain legitimacy and build trust with visitors.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization to improve user experience and search engine visibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Polish Society of Ultrasound
Description
The website promotes the 36th Congress of the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology and the 17th Congress of the Polish Ultrasound Society, scheduled for June 11-14, 2026 in Lublin, Poland. It serves as an informational platform for congress details, registration, venue, scientific committees, and sponsors.
Key services
Congress information dissemination, Registration management, Scientific program and committee details, Venue and accommodation information
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Fonts (Montserrat), Slick Slider
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS assumed (URL uses https)
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, which reduces trustworthiness.
  3. Website content is professional and targeted at medical professionals.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided with official email and phone.
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  6. No security policy or incident response information is published.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in the HTML.
  8. No social media links found on the homepage.
  9. No forms detected on the homepage; registration and abstract submission pages likely contain forms but not included in provided HTML.
  10. No security headers visible in provided data; SSL assumed due to HTTPS URL but not confirmed.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern but basic technology stack with HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Fonts, and Slick Slider for UI elements. There is no evidence of a CMS or advanced frameworks. The site is mobile responsive and has a clear navigation structure. Performance is moderate with no critical errors or broken elements detected. However, the absence of security headers and limited SEO metadata indicates room for technical improvement. The site does not appear to use analytics or tracking scripts, which may limit marketing insights but improves privacy. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for an informational event site but could benefit from enhanced security and SEO practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with euroson2026.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review euroson2026.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.