Skip to main content

Security report for euroland.com

Eurolandcom AB · Finance · Sweden

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Euroland operates as a small finance-focused service provider specializing in investor relations and stock portal services. The website targets investors and shareholders, offering access to IR services and a stock portal platform. The business appears niche with a moderate market position in the finance sector, primarily serving Swedish clientele as indicated by the default country code and company name. Technically, the website uses standard web technologies such as Bootstrap, jQuery, and Google reCAPTCHA, but lacks advanced frameworks or CMS detection. The site is moderately optimized for mobile and performance but has basic SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is limited, with no visible HTTPS enforcement or security headers, though Google reCAPTCHA is implemented to protect forms. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a significant concern, impacting trust and legitimacy. Privacy and cookie policies are missing, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are evident. Overall, the site is functional but requires improvements in security, compliance, and transparency to enhance trustworthiness and professional standing.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching euroland.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Euroland's business model centers on providing investor relations services and a stock portal, catering to companies and investors in the financial sector. The company leverages a partner domain (services.euroland.com) for service delivery. The lack of detailed company information such as founding year or parent company limits deeper analysis. The website's minimal content and basic design suggest a small-scale operation. The absence of social media presence and limited contact information restricts outreach and customer engagement. The business likely generates revenue through service subscriptions or fees related to investor relations and stock market data access. Growth potential may be constrained by limited digital maturity and transparency. Strategic partnerships and enhanced digital presence could improve market positioning.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a low to moderate security maturity level. The use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms is a positive control against automated abuse. However, the lack of HTTPS enforcement details, absence of security headers, and missing privacy and cookie policies indicate compliance gaps, especially concerning GDPR and NIS2 regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which may hinder timely handling of security events. The missing WHOIS data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and potential risks. Overall, the security posture requires significant enhancements to protect user data, ensure regulatory compliance, and build trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with strict transport security (HSTS) and ensure all site content is served securely.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements and implement a cookie consent mechanism.
  3. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  4. Establish and publicize an incident response plan and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve security transparency and readiness.
  5. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS registration data to enhance domain legitimacy and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Eurolandcom AB
Description
Euroland provides investor relations services and a stock portal platform, targeting investors and shareholders.
Key services
Investor Relations Services, Euroland Stock Portal
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery, Font Awesome, Google reCAPTCHA
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with no WAF or blocking mechanisms.
  2. WHOIS data is missing, indicating possible domain registration issues.
  3. Website offers investor relations services and a stock portal.
  4. No privacy or cookie policies found, only Terms & Conditions page.
  5. Contact form uses Google reCAPTCHA for spam protection.
  6. No explicit security headers or HTTPS enforcement visible in provided data.
  7. No social media links or phone numbers explicitly provided.
  8. Content is minimal and basic but relevant to finance and investor relations.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a basic technology stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for scripting, Font Awesome for icons, and Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection. The HTML content is valid but minimal, with limited SEO and accessibility features. No CMS or advanced frameworks are detected, indicating a possibly custom or static site. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization indicators. Mobile optimization is basic but functional. The site lacks modern security headers and HTTPS enforcement details, which are critical for secure operations. The absence of hosting provider information and domain registration data suggests potential technical and operational risks. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports basic functionality but requires modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 75/100Medium27 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with euroland.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review euroland.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.