Security report for eurohandball.com
European Handball Federation · Media · N/a
The European Handball Federation (EHF) operates a comprehensive and professionally designed website serving as the central hub for European handball competitions, news, media, and fan engagement. The site offers extensive information on club and national team competitions, development programs, and services such as media accreditation and ticketing. The EHF positions itself as the authoritative body for handball in Europe with a strong digital presence and multiple linked domains supporting its ecosystem. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript frameworks including Vue.js, integrates advanced analytics tools like Segment and Google Tag Manager, and uses a robust cookie consent mechanism via Iubenda, ensuring GDPR compliance. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, providing a positive user experience. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent with per-purpose control, though explicit security headers could be more visible. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data for the domain is a notable anomaly that slightly impacts trustworthiness, though the professional nature of the site mitigates concerns. Overall, the EHF website demonstrates a mature digital infrastructure with strong content quality and privacy compliance. The main risk lies in the missing WHOIS data, which should be monitored. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security header implementation, improving contact information visibility, and regular audits of third-party scripts to maintain security posture.
Scanned
NIS2 and GDPR posture
- NIS2 outside view
- Not assessed
- GDPR outside view
- Not assessed
Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.
Priority findings
1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.
SSL/TLS
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
- High
Weak Protocols Supported
Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions
- CWE-327
- OWASP A04:2025
- ASVS V12.1.1
- RFC 8996
- RFC 7568
- Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: tls_versions TLSv1.2, TLSv1.3
- NIS2 21(2)(h)
- IR 2024/2690 9.2(b): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(b): Cryptography
- NIST SC-8(1): NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-8(1): Cryptographic Protection
- High
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
Keep watching eurohandball.com
This scan found 13 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended€25per month
- TLS certificates and expiry
- DNS records
- SPF, DKIM and DMARC
- Security headers
- GDPR and NIS2 posture
- Exposed services
- Third-party trackers
- Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
- The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
- Email delivery with an unlock code
- Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
- SSL/TLS
- 62
- Email security
- 85
- DNS health
- 80
- Network security
- 100
- Average
- 82
- After the cap
- 75
Not counted
- Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
- GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
- NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
- OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
- The certificate is not trusted by browsers
- The website is not served over HTTPS
- A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
- The page loads a script from a compromised source
- The domain registration has expired
- SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
- Critical0–25
- High26–49
- Medium50–75
- Low76–100
Technical appendix
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
Security posture
Recommendations
- Implement and verify explicit security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against clickjacking and MIME sniffing.
- Increase visibility and accessibility of contact information, including official emails and phone numbers, to improve business credibility and user trust.
- Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and analytics tools to mitigate risks from external dependencies.
- Publish clear security policies and incident response procedures on the website to demonstrate security maturity and readiness.
- Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data issue to improve domain registration transparency and trustworthiness.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
- Company
- European Handball Federation
- Description
- The European Handball Federation (EHF) is the governing body for handball in Europe, organizing competitions, providing news, tickets, and media services related to handball.
- Key services
- Media services including EHFTV and media accreditation, Ticket sales and event scheduling, Marketing and promotion of handball, Development programs and education, Whistleblowing platform and arbitration services
- Content quality
- excellent
- Branding
- consistent
Technology
- Stack
- Vue.js, Axios, Lodash, Flickity, Segment Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Iubenda Cookie Solution, Typeform
- Frameworks
- Vue.js
- Performance
- moderate
- Mobile
- good
- Accessibility
- good
- SEO
- good
Security
- Observed score
- 85/100
- Good practices seen
- HTTPS enforced
- Cookie consent with per-purpose consent
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
- Use of security and privacy scripts (Iubenda, Google Tag Manager with consent mode)
Analytics and tracking
- Services
- Segment Analytics, Google Tag Manager, TikTok Analytics
- Tracking level
- moderate
- Privacy practices
- good
Advertising
- Ad networks
- Adzerk
- Tracking pixels
- TikTok Pixel, Segment Analytics
- Marketing tools
- Segment Analytics, Iubenda Cookie Solution
- Transparency
- good
Site quality
- Design
- excellent
- User experience
- excellent
- Content relevance
- excellent
- Navigation
- excellent
- Professionalism
- excellent
- Trustworthiness
- high
Key observations
- Website is professionally designed and well-structured with extensive content on European handball.
- Strong focus on sports event coverage, media, and fan engagement.
- Comprehensive cookie and privacy consent mechanisms implemented.
- No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the main site.
- WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is unusual for a major sports federation domain.
- No security challenges or WAF blocks detected; site fully accessible.
- Use of modern JavaScript frameworks and analytics tools.
- No adult or questionable content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes
Notes
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
- MITRE CWE (opens in a new tab)4.20 (2026-04-30) · CWE Terms of Use (free use with attribution, © MITRE)
- OWASP Top 10:2025 (opens in a new tab)2025 (membership per CWE 4.20) · CC BY-SA 4.0
- MITRE CAPEC (opens in a new tab)3.9 (2023-01-24) · CAPEC Terms of Use (free use with attribution, © MITRE)
- OWASP ASVS (opens in a new tab)5.0.0 · CC BY-SA 4.0
- OWASP Web Security Testing Guide (opens in a new tab)latest (checklist.json, master) · CC BY-SA 4.0
- OWASP Secure Headers Project (opens in a new tab)2026-10-18 · Apache-2.0
- Mozilla Server Side TLS (intermediate) (opens in a new tab)6.0 · MPL-2.0
- NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 (OSCAL catalog) (opens in a new tab)5.2.0 · Public domain (US Government work)
- Directive (EU) 2022/2555 (NIS2) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 333, 27.12.2022 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 (opens in a new tab)OJ L, 18.10.2024 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 119, 4.5.2016 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Directive 2002/58/EC (ePrivacy), consolidated (opens in a new tab)19.12.2009 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- RFC Editor metadata (opens in a new tab)per-RFC (obsolete RFCs rejected) · IETF Trust Legal Provisions (metadata only)
- NIST CSRC, W3C TR, IETF Datatracker, EDPB, EUR-Lex CELLAR and gesetze-bayern.de (opens in a new tab)per document · Titles and links only
- NIST NVD CVE API 2.0 (opens in a new tab)live records · Public domain (NVD); CVE® records © MITRE, free use
- W3C WCAG 2.2 (opens in a new tab)W3C Recommendation (wcag.json) · W3C Software and Document License
- ETSI EN 301 549 (opens in a new tab)V3.2.1 (2021-03), clause headings · Clause numbers and titles only (© ETSI)
- Directive (EU) 2019/882 (European Accessibility Act) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 151, 7.6.2019 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
- Directive (EU) 2016/2102 (Web Accessibility Directive) (opens in a new tab)OJ L 327, 2.12.2016 · EUR-Lex reuse under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU (© European Union)
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Earlier scans of this domain
- 56/100Medium22 findingsView report
Feedback on this report
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with eurohandball.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review eurohandball.com.