Skip to main content

Security report for eurogamer.net

Gamer Network Limited · Media · United Kingdom

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Eurogamer.net is a well-established online media platform specializing in video game news, reviews, and guides since 1999. Owned by Gamer Network Limited, the site targets gaming enthusiasts globally with a strong presence in the UK. The business model is primarily advertising-driven, leveraging multiple ad networks and tracking technologies to monetize content. The website demonstrates a mature digital infrastructure with modern analytics and consent management tools, ensuring compliance with privacy regulations such as GDPR. Security posture is robust with HTTPS enforcement and security headers, though there is room for improvement in incident response transparency and vulnerability disclosure. Overall, Eurogamer.net presents a professional, trustworthy, and content-rich platform with a high level of technical and business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching eurogamer.net

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
55
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Eurogamer.net holds a strong market position as a leading gaming news and reviews site with a loyal audience. Its competitive advantage lies in its longevity, comprehensive editorial policies, and multi-platform social media engagement. Revenue streams are primarily from advertising, supported by sophisticated ad bidding and tracking technologies. The target customer segment includes gamers and gaming industry followers. The company benefits from its parent organization, Gamer Network Limited, which provides operational and strategic support. The partnership ecosystem includes major ad networks and analytics providers, enhancing monetization and audience insights. Strategic observations suggest maintaining transparency in security and privacy practices could further strengthen user trust.

Security posture

The website exhibits a solid security maturity level with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and consent-based cookie management. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. However, the absence of a public vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file and lack of explicit incident response contacts indicate potential gaps in security transparency and readiness. Compliance with GDPR is evident through consent mechanisms and privacy policies. The security culture appears professional but could benefit from enhanced communication channels for security incidents and disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a formal vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information to improve transparency and user trust.
  3. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and ad networks for security vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance data retention policy disclosures to align with privacy best practices.
  5. Maintain and update consent management tools to ensure ongoing GDPR compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Gamer Network Limited
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Gamer Network Limited
Description
Your trusted source for video game news, reviews and guides, since 1999.
Key services
Video game news, Reviews, Guides
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Prebid.js, Chartbeat, Crazy Egg, Google Analytics, Comscore, Brockman Ads and Consent Management
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Consent management for cookies
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Chartbeat, Comscore, Crazy Egg
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Rubicon, Sovrn, Pubmatic, IX, Teads, Sharethrough, AMX, OneTag, Criteo, AppNexus, OpenWeb, Medianet, Yieldmo, KueezRTB, TripleLift, Rise, TTD
Tracking pixels
Chartbeat, Crazy Egg, Comscore
Marketing tools
Brockman Consent Management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. Strong presence of privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  3. Use of multiple ad networks and tracking services with consent management.
  4. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found in HTML content.
  5. WHOIS data unavailable or protected, limiting domain registration transparency.
  6. Website uses modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  7. Content is safe and targeted at general audience interested in gaming.
  8. No explicit security incident response or vulnerability disclosure info found.
Technical notes

Notes

Eurogamer.net employs a modern technology stack including JavaScript frameworks, Google Tag Manager, Prebid.js for programmatic advertising, and multiple analytics platforms such as Google Analytics, Chartbeat, and Comscore. The site is optimized for mobile with responsive design and lazy loading techniques. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in load times due to extensive third-party scripts. Accessibility and SEO optimizations are well implemented, contributing to a positive user experience. Technical risks include dependency on multiple third-party ad and tracking services which require continuous security monitoring to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with eurogamer.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review eurogamer.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.