Skip to main content

Security report for euretinacongressdaily.org

EURETINA · Healthcare · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Euretina Congress Daily is a specialized online news platform focused on providing updates and coverage related to the EURETINA Congress, a key event in the field of ophthalmology and retina care. The website targets medical professionals, particularly retina specialists and ophthalmologists, offering timely information about congress events and related medical news. The business model is informational and media-centric, serving a niche healthcare audience with relevant content. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using the Elementor page builder and Astra theme, hosted with DNS services via Cloudflare and registered through EuroDNS S.A. The infrastructure supports modern web standards including HTTPS and responsive design, ensuring good user experience across devices. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protections in place, though additional HTTP security headers and DNSSEC could enhance security further. Privacy compliance is addressed with a cookie consent mechanism and a linked privacy policy, indicating awareness of GDPR requirements. However, the absence of explicit contact information, terms of service, and security policy pages limits transparency and user trust. Overall, the site is professionally designed and functional but could improve in security disclosures and business contact transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching euretinacongressdaily.org

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
55
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The platform occupies a niche market segment focused on medical congress news for retina specialists, leveraging the reputation of EURETINA. Its competitive advantage lies in specialized, timely content for a targeted professional audience. Revenue streams are likely indirect, possibly through sponsorships or advertising, though no explicit monetization is visible. The partnership ecosystem is minimal with no partner domains detected. Growth indicators include recent domain registration and active content updates. Strategic observations suggest potential to expand business credibility by adding contact channels, terms of service, and security policies to build trust with users and stakeholders.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protections active. The lack of DNSSEC and additional security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The cookie consent mechanism aligns with GDPR compliance but lacks detailed cookie disclosures. Incident response readiness is not evident due to missing security contact information or vulnerability disclosure policies. Overall, the security posture is adequate for an informational site but should be enhanced to meet higher compliance and trust standards.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Add a terms of service page to clarify user agreements and legal protections.
  5. Enhance transparency by providing verified contact information including emails and phone numbers.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
EURETINA
Description
Website providing daily news and updates related to the EURETINA Congress, focused on retina and ophthalmology.
Key services
Congress news updates, Medical event coverage
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Astra Theme, jQuery, Google Analytics, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
WordPress, Elementor
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses WordPress with Elementor and Astra theme.
  2. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed categories but no cookies currently displayed.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found on homepage or metadata.
  4. No terms of service page detected.
  5. Google Analytics and Tag Manager used for tracking.
  6. HTTPS is enforced with valid SSL.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  8. No explicit business contact or security contact information found.
  9. Domain is relatively new but consistent with business purpose.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and popular CMS (WordPress) with Elementor page builder and Astra theme, indicating a well-supported and flexible technical infrastructure. The use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager shows integration of analytics and marketing tools. Performance is moderate with standard libraries like jQuery and font services from Google Fonts. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. Accessibility features are basic but present. The site lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC, which are recommended for improved security posture. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business goals but has room for modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with euretinacongressdaily.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review euretinacongressdaily.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.