Skip to main content

Security report for euraspaskolos.lt

Finance · Lithuania

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Euraspaskolos.lt is a Lithuanian financial services website specializing in credit comparison, offering users the ability to compare quick loans, consumer loans, and auto leasing options from various providers. The platform operates primarily through affiliate marketing, directing users to loan providers via tracked affiliate links. The website targets Lithuanian consumers seeking convenient and comprehensive credit options online. Technically, the site employs a modern web stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, Google Analytics, and Facebook SDK, hosted behind Cloudflare for DNS and security. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation and content relevance, though it lacks some advanced accessibility features. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and a Content-Security-Policy header, but could be improved by adding additional security headers and formal security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies and no visible consent mechanisms. No contact information or incident response channels are provided, which limits trust and compliance. Overall, the website is functional and moderately professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy, security, and transparency measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching euraspaskolos.lt

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the finance sector as a credit comparison service, leveraging affiliate partnerships to monetize traffic. Its market position is niche within Lithuania, focusing on consumers looking for quick and consumer loans. The business model relies on affiliate commissions from loan providers, with a user base of over 259,000 interactions as indicated on the site. The company was founded in 2015, consistent with domain registration data. Partnerships with affiliate networks such as goodaff.com and development by goodday.group indicate a structured ecosystem. The site includes user reviews to build trust but lacks formal certifications or compliance statements. Growth potential depends on improving compliance and expanding service offerings.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and a Content-Security-Policy header to upgrade insecure requests. However, it lacks other important security headers like X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection, and Strict-Transport-Security. No sensitive data is exposed in the HTML, and no vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The absence of a security policy, incident response contact, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates gaps in security governance. The use of third-party scripts such as Google Analytics and Facebook SDK introduces privacy considerations. Overall, the security posture is adequate but requires enhancements to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add additional HTTP security headers including X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Provide clear contact information including email and phone for customer support and incident response.
  4. Publish a security policy and consider adding a security.txt file for vulnerability disclosure.
  5. Review and audit third-party scripts for privacy and security impact and minimize tracking where possible.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Palyginti visi greitieji Lietuvoje kreditai, vartojimo kreditai ir automobilių kreditai internete. Išsirink palankiausią! The site offers credit comparison services including quick loans, consumer loans, and auto leasing providers in Lithuania.
Key services
Credit comparison, Affiliate links to loan providers, User reviews of credit providers
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Analytics, Facebook SDK, Google APIs
Frameworks
Bootstrap (implied by navbar classes and carousel)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Content-Security-Policy header present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Facebook SDK
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Lithuanian credit comparison platform with affiliate marketing business model.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on main page.
  4. Uses modern web technologies and standard security practices but lacks some security headers.
  5. Includes social media links to Facebook and Twitter.
  6. No visible forms collecting personal data on the homepage.
  7. Affiliate links use nofollow and event tracking for analytics.
  8. Content is in Lithuanian language targeting local consumers.
  9. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  10. No explicit certifications or security policies published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a standard technology stack with jQuery, Bootstrap framework, Google Analytics, and Facebook SDK for social integration and tracking. Hosting is via Cloudflare, providing DNS and security benefits. The site is mobile responsive and includes SEO meta tags and Open Graph data for social sharing. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. Accessibility is basic with room for improvement. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or lightweight platform. Technical debt appears low but the site could benefit from modern security headers and enhanced privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with euraspaskolos.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review euraspaskolos.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.