Skip to main content

Security report for eurasiagroup.net

Eurasia Group · Media · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Eurasia Group is a prominent global political risk consultancy headquartered in the United States with additional offices in Washington and London. The company specializes in providing political risk advisory, management consulting, thought leadership, speaking engagements, and event services to businesses and organizations navigating geopolitical uncertainties. Their market position is that of an established leader in the political risk and geopolitical analysis sector, supported by a strong digital presence and client engagement platforms. Technically, the website is built on a modern ASP.NET framework with extensive use of JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and UI components, hosted behind Cloudflare for performance and security. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, fast loading times, and solid SEO practices. Integration with marketing and analytics tools like MailChimp, Hotjar, Facebook Pixel, and Twitter tracking indicates a mature digital marketing strategy. From a security perspective, the site employs HTTPS with TLS 1.3 and 1.2, uses secure and HttpOnly cookies, and has OCSP stapling enabled. However, it lacks some advanced security headers such as HSTS and Content-Security-Policy, which are recommended for enhanced protection. The site has well-defined privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms, indicating good privacy compliance. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, Eurasia Group's website reflects a professional, secure, and privacy-conscious digital presence aligned with its business objectives. Strategic improvements in security headers and incident response transparency could further strengthen its security posture and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching eurasiagroup.net

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Eurasia Group operates in the niche of political risk advisory and geopolitical consulting, targeting corporate clients and institutions requiring insights into global political developments. Their business model revolves around expert analysis, consulting services, and thought leadership content, supported by events and speaking engagements. The company leverages a strong partnership ecosystem, including media outlets like GZERO Media, and maintains a client portal for service delivery. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the homepage suggests a controlled client engagement process, likely emphasizing privacy and security. The company’s digital footprint and marketing tools indicate a focus on lead generation and client retention through newsletters and social media engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS enforcement, secure cookie attributes, and protection against common SSL/TLS vulnerabilities. The presence of SPF and DMARC DNS records enhances email security and reduces phishing risks. However, the lack of DNSSEC and CAA records represents a minor gap in DNS security. The absence of advanced HTTP security headers such as HSTS and Content-Security-Policy limits protection against certain attack vectors like protocol downgrade and cross-site scripting. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is publicly available, which could be improved to enhance transparency and readiness. Overall, the site balances usability and security well but could benefit from adopting additional best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Enable HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload to enforce HTTPS and prevent downgrade attacks.
  2. Implement additional security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish a security.txt file and incident response contact information to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve trust.
  4. Regularly review and update cookie consent mechanisms to ensure ongoing compliance with evolving privacy regulations.
  5. Consider enabling DNSSEC and CAA DNS records to enhance domain name system security and certificate issuance control.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on ASP.NET technology with a rich client-side experience powered by jQuery and various UI libraries. It uses Cloudflare as a CDN and security provider, ensuring fast content delivery and DDoS protection. The site loads quickly with zero reported resource or page size issues, indicating efficient asset management. Mobile optimization is handled via responsive CSS and media queries. Analytics and marketing integrations are well implemented, including Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Facebook Pixel, and Twitter tracking. The absence of a detected CMS suggests a custom or proprietary content management approach. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern, scalable, and aligned with best practices for performance and user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with eurasiagroup.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review eurasiagroup.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.