Skip to main content

Security report for etpmaladiesrares.com

Healthcare · France

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website 'Votre annuaire ETP Maladies Rares' serves as an educational and directory platform focused on Therapeutic Patient Education (ETP) for rare diseases. It provides patients, families, and healthcare professionals with resources, videos, and guides to better manage chronic illnesses. The site is positioned as a niche healthcare education resource in France, founded in 2017 and hosted on WordPress.com. The content is well-structured, relevant, and consistent with healthcare education standards, referencing authoritative organizations such as the WHO and French health authorities. Technically, the site leverages WordPress CMS with standard plugins and Google Fonts, hosted by Automattic Inc. Performance and mobile optimization are moderate to good, though accessibility and SEO are basic. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protection, but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC. Privacy compliance is limited, with a legal mentions page but no explicit cookie consent mechanism or detailed privacy policy. Security evaluation shows no critical vulnerabilities or malicious indicators, but improvements are recommended in security headers and privacy transparency. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers limits business credibility slightly, though the site maintains moderate trustworthiness through authoritative content and consistent branding. Overall, the website is a functional, safe, and informative resource for its target audience but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance, security hardening, and clearer business contact information to improve trust and compliance posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching etpmaladiesrares.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
30
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates in the healthcare and education sectors, targeting patients with rare diseases and healthcare professionals involved in therapeutic education. Its business model centers on providing a specialized directory and educational content rather than commercial transactions. Market positioning is niche with a focus on rare diseases and patient empowerment. The site references reputable health authorities, enhancing its credibility. Growth potential lies in expanding content, partnerships with healthcare institutions, and improving user engagement. The hosting on WordPress.com suggests a small-scale operation without complex infrastructure. No direct revenue streams or partnerships are evident from the data provided.

Security posture

The security posture is moderate. The site uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and domain transfer protection, which are positive indicators. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no advanced security headers (such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options) were detected, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. There is no visible security or incident response policy, nor vulnerability disclosure information. The lack of explicit privacy and cookie policies may pose compliance risks under GDPR. No signs of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found. Overall, the site is secure for general use but would benefit from implementing additional security best practices and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Add a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to enhance GDPR compliance and user trust.
  4. Provide clear business contact information including verified emails and phone numbers to improve credibility and user support.
  5. Develop and publish a security policy and incident response plan to demonstrate security maturity and readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Annuaire et ressources autour de l'Éducation Thérapeutique du Patient (ETP) pour les maladies rares, visant à aider les patients à mieux gérer leur maladie chronique.
Key services
Directory of ETP resources, Educational content about ETP, Links to videos and guides
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Google Fonts, Jetpack, Gutenberg
Platforms
WordPress.com hosting
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
WordPress.com Stats
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
wordpress.com pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a French language healthcare education directory focused on rare diseases and patient therapeutic education.
  2. Content is well structured and informative with references to authoritative sources.
  3. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found; contact likely via contact form.
  4. No explicit privacy or cookie policy banner detected, though legal mentions page exists.
  5. No advanced security headers detected; HTTPS is enforced.
  6. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  7. Website uses WordPress.com hosting and standard WordPress plugins and fonts.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS hosted by Automattic Inc. It uses standard WordPress plugins including Jetpack and Gutenberg, and loads Google Fonts asynchronously. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and basic accessibility features. Performance is moderate with no major errors detected. SEO is basic with proper meta tags and Open Graph data for social sharing. There is no evidence of advanced frameworks or custom backend technologies. The site relies on WordPress.com infrastructure, which provides reliable hosting but limits customization of security headers and DNS settings. Technical debt appears low, but opportunities exist to enhance security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with etpmaladiesrares.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review etpmaladiesrares.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.