Skip to main content

Security report for et-magazin.de

VDE VERLAG GmbH · Energy · Germany

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website energie.de hosts the magazine 'et - Energiewirtschaftliche Tagesfragen', a professional publication focused on the energy sector, covering news, expert articles, interviews, and future-oriented topics. Operated by VDE VERLAG GmbH, it targets professionals and stakeholders in the energy industry, providing specialized content and subscription services. The site demonstrates a solid market position as a specialized energy media publisher in Germany. Technically, the website is built on TYPO3 CMS with Yoast SEO integration, employing modern web technologies including JavaScript and CSS. Hosting is managed via agenturserver nameservers, indicating a professional hosting environment. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO and basic accessibility features, delivering moderate performance. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms compliant with GDPR. However, it lacks explicit security headers and published security policies or incident response contacts. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Advertising is managed transparently with GDPR consent, and analytics are performed via etracker with moderate user tracking. Overall, the website is professional, secure, and compliant with privacy regulations, suitable for its target audience. Recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing a security policy, and adding vulnerability disclosure information to further strengthen trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching et-magazin.de

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
75
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
80
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

energie.de operates as a specialized energy sector media publisher under VDE VERLAG GmbH, offering news, expert analysis, and digital magazine services. Its business model revolves around content publishing, subscriptions, and advertising targeted at energy professionals. The site maintains a consistent brand presence and leverages partnerships with advertising networks like AdSpirit. The presence of job listings indicates active engagement with the energy sector labor market. Social media integration with LinkedIn and Xing supports professional networking and audience engagement. The company appears medium-sized with a focused niche in the German energy market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS and GDPR-compliant cookie consent. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of published security or incident response policies represent areas for improvement. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were detected, which could enhance transparency and incident handling readiness. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from formalized policies and additional technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, HSTS) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Continue maintaining GDPR compliance and transparent cookie consent mechanisms.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and advertising integrations to minimize security risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
VDE VERLAG GmbH
Description
Magazin et - Energiewirtschaftliche Tagesfragen providing news, expert articles, future questions, interviews, and comments related to the energy sector.
Key services
Energy industry news, Expert articles, Interviews, Magazine subscriptions, Digital magazines and apps
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS, HTML5
Frameworks
TYPO3 CMS, Yoast SEO for TYPO3
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
etracker
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
AdSpirit
Tracking pixels
etracker
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professional and relevant to the energy sector.
  3. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented in compliance with GDPR.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the main page; contact form is available.
  5. Advertising is present but transparent with GDPR consent.
  6. Social media presence on LinkedIn and Xing is linked.
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  9. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and consistency of domain registration.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on TYPO3 CMS with Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a modern and SEO-optimized infrastructure. JavaScript and CSS assets are compressed and served efficiently. Hosting is via agenturserver, with consistent nameservers. The site is mobile responsive and has good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. Accessibility is basic but functional. No deprecated or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and user-friendly experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with et-magazin.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review et-magazin.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.