Skip to main content

Security report for estfilm.ee

Estfilm Production OÜ · Media · Estonia

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

37/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Estfilm Production OÜ is a small Estonian film production company established in 2006, specializing in cultural, nature, and regional films to promote Estonia. They serve both public and private sector clients and offer a range of services including aerial filming, time-lapse filming, 3D animations, and video editing. The company maintains a consistent brand presence and showcases its portfolio via a YouTube channel. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using older jQuery and Google Analytics for tracking, with basic mobile optimization and accessibility. Security posture is moderate but could be improved by updating libraries and implementing security headers. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies and lack of consent mechanisms. Overall, the website is functional and professional but requires enhancements in security and privacy to meet modern standards.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching estfilm.ee

This scan found 32 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
37

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Estfilm holds a stable position in the Estonian media production sector with a clear focus on film and video services. Their business model is service-oriented, targeting governmental and corporate clients. The company leverages partnerships with notable organizations such as EAS and Siemens AG, indicating strong market credibility. Growth potential exists through international projects and expanding digital presence. The absence of detailed business certifications or security policies suggests room for maturity in compliance and trust-building. Their marketing relies on portfolio visibility and direct contact rather than extensive digital marketing or advertising networks.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS usage implied but lacks visible security headers and uses an outdated jQuery version, which may expose it to vulnerabilities. No privacy or cookie policies are present, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. Google Analytics is used without a cookie consent mechanism, which may pose GDPR compliance risks. The absence of security best practices such as CSP, HSTS, and secure form handling reduces the overall security maturity. There is no evidence of a dedicated security policy or incident response contact, indicating limited preparedness for security incidents.

Recommendations

  1. Update all JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to current secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with visible consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  3. Add and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Enhance mobile responsiveness and accessibility to improve user experience and SEO.
  5. Establish and publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve trust and readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Estfilm Production OÜ
Description
Estfilm is a film production company operating since 2006, producing cultural, nature, and regional films to promote Estonia. They collaborate with public and private sector clients including EAS, Justiitsministeerium, Siemens AG, Eesti Energia, and others. Services include film production, aerial and time-lapse filming, 3D animations, and computer graphics.
Key services
Film production, Aerial filming, Time-lapse filming, 3D animations and computer graphics, Video editing, DVD/CD production, IP video surveillance systems
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.9.1, Google Analytics (ga.js), Custom JavaScript (estfilm.js), Google Fonts (Open Sans, Open Sans Condensed)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by URLs
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Contact information is limited but clearly presented in the footer.
  4. Website uses outdated jQuery version which may pose security risks.
  5. Google Analytics is used without visible cookie consent mechanism.
  6. Content is primarily in Estonian with English language option available.
  7. No forms detected on the homepage HTML content.
  8. No structured data (JSON-LD, Open Graph) or meta tags beyond basic charset and fonts.
  9. No visible security headers or advanced security policies.
  10. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic but functional.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with custom theming and uses Google Fonts and Google Analytics for tracking. The JavaScript stack includes an outdated jQuery 1.9.1 version, which is a security risk. The site loads asynchronously Google Analytics scripts and uses custom JavaScript for UI interactions. No advanced frameworks or platforms are detected. Performance is moderate with basic SEO and accessibility features. The site lacks structured data such as JSON-LD or Open Graph metadata, limiting SEO effectiveness. Hosting provider details are not evident from the HTML content. Overall, the technical implementation is functional but dated and could benefit from modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with estfilm.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review estfilm.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.