Skip to main content

Security report for estetikastudija.lv

Estētikas Studija · Healthcare · Latvia

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Estētikas Studija is a small, locally recognized beauty salon based in Jelgava, Latvia, specializing in facial and body care procedures. The business emphasizes professional cosmetic treatments using advanced technologies and has received a notable industry award, positioning it as a trusted service provider in the local cosmetology market. The website is built on Joomla! CMS and uses common frontend libraries such as jQuery and Bootstrap, providing a good user experience with responsive design and clear navigation. However, the site lacks privacy and cookie policies, and no WHOIS data was available due to query limits, which limits full domain legitimacy verification. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but missing important security headers. Contact information is comprehensive, including phone numbers, emails, physical address, and a contact form, supporting business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching estetikastudija.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention estetikastudija.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for estetikastudija.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the healthcare sector focusing on beauty and cosmetology services. It targets general consumers seeking professional skincare and beauty treatments. The business model is service-oriented with a focus on quality and professionalism, supported by industry recognition. The website content and structure indicate a stable local presence with no evident partnerships or subsidiaries. The absence of analytics and tracking tools suggests a privacy-conscious or low-scale digital marketing approach. The company maintains direct contact channels and showcases its specialists, enhancing customer trust and engagement.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and implements CSRF tokens in AJAX forms, indicating basic security awareness. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces the overall security posture. No evidence of vulnerability disclosures, incident response policies, or data protection officer contacts were found, indicating potential compliance gaps. The contact form lacks visible anti-spam or CAPTCHA protections, which could expose the site to spam or abuse. Overall, security is adequate for a small business but could be improved to meet higher standards and compliance requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and enable HSTS to strengthen security posture.
  3. Introduce CAPTCHA or other anti-spam mechanisms on contact forms to prevent abuse.
  4. Regularly update Joomla! CMS and all extensions to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding analytics with privacy-respecting configurations to better understand user behavior and improve marketing.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
"Estētikas Studija" SIA
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Estētikas Studija
Description
Estētikas Studija is a beauty salon located in Jelgava, Latvia, specializing in facial and body care procedures. The salon is recognized with the 'Beauty Expert Award' in the category 'Gada salons' for cosmetology, highlighting its achievements and contributions to the industry. It offers professional cosmetic treatments using advanced aesthetic medicine technologies and professional cosmetics. The business targets clients seeking beauty and skincare services.
Key services
Facial procedures, Body procedures, Injections for face and body, Manicure and pedicure, Other beauty procedures
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Owl Carousel, Sppagebuilder
Frameworks
Helix Ultimate
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS
  • CSRF token implemented in AJAX forms

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented including phone, email, physical address, and contact form.
  5. Website uses Joomla! CMS with common frontend libraries and frameworks.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  7. No social media links found on the site.
  8. Security headers are missing; HTTPS is used but security posture can be improved.
  9. Content is professional, relevant, and safe for general audiences.
  10. Business is a small local beauty salon in Latvia with recognized industry award.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Joomla! CMS with Helix Ultimate framework and uses frontend libraries such as jQuery, Bootstrap, and Owl Carousel for UI components. The site loads moderate resources and is mobile responsive with good navigation clarity. However, SEO optimization is basic with limited meta tags and no structured data like JSON-LD present. Accessibility features are minimal but functional. The hosting provider is not identified from the data. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements possible by optimizing assets and implementing caching strategies. The technical stack is standard for small business websites but lacks advanced modern features or integrations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with estetikastudija.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review estetikastudija.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.