Skip to main content

Security report for estetica.pl

Estetica · Hospitality · Poland

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Estetica.pl is the online presence of a local beauty salon located in Kraków, Poland, offering cosmetic and beauty treatments. The website targets general consumers seeking beauty services in the Kraków area. The business operates as a small-sized entity with a clear focus on local clientele. The site features modern digital marketing and analytics tools such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The website is well-structured with good content quality and consistent branding, providing clear contact information and business details via structured data markup. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented; however, the absence of explicit privacy policy and terms of service pages, as well as missing security headers, suggests room for improvement in compliance and security best practices. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and safe for general audiences.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching estetica.pl

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention estetica.pl, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for estetica.pl right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a local beauty clinic with a focus on cosmetic treatments, serving customers primarily in Kraków. Its business model revolves around direct service provision in the hospitality sector. The website leverages third-party marketing and analytics platforms to enhance customer engagement and track user behavior. There is no evidence of complex partnerships or subsidiaries. The business appears to maintain a straightforward operational model with a focus on customer experience and local market penetration. Growth indicators or founding year are not disclosed. The presence of structured data and cookie consent mechanisms reflects awareness of regulatory requirements, although formal privacy and terms documentation is lacking.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and integrates cookie consent via Cookiebot, demonstrating compliance with basic security and privacy standards. Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel are used for tracking, which is disclosed through the cookie consent dialog. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Incident response and security policy documentation are not found, indicating potential gaps in formal security governance. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be enhanced by implementing additional security headers and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page detailing data processing and user rights.
  2. Add a terms of service page to clarify user agreements and legal disclaimers.
  3. Implement security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to harden the website.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response policy with clear contact channels for security issues.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize security risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Estetica
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Estetica
Description
Zabiegi wykonywane w klinice urody Estetica w Krakowie. Zapraszamy 12 422 80 30
Key services
Beauty treatments, Cosmetic procedures
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Cookiebot, Google Fonts, Google Maps API
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Ads
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Meta Platforms (Facebook)
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot, Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot with detailed cookie declarations.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, and physical address.
  5. Use of modern tracking and analytics tools is evident.
  6. No security headers detected in the provided data; potential area for improvement.
  7. Website content is relevant and professionally presented for a local beauty salon.
  8. No suspicious or malicious domains linked.
  9. No adult or NSFW content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Cookiebot for cookie management, Google Fonts, and Google Maps API. The HTML structure is valid and includes SEO-friendly meta tags and Open Graph tags. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design elements. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts to improve page load times. Accessibility features are basic but present. No CMS or hosting provider details are explicitly detected from the HTML content. The site could benefit from enhanced accessibility and performance optimizations as well as improved security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with estetica.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review estetica.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.