Skip to main content

Security report for espritbohemia.cz

ESPRIT BOHEMIA s.r.o. · Media · Czech Republic

Low risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ESPRIT BOHEMIA s.r.o. operates as a Czech publishing company specializing in magazines such as TVOŘÍME s láskou, RITUALS, ESTETIKA, PERFECT WOMAN, Sofie, and Sofie Bydlení. The company targets a general audience interested in lifestyle and family-oriented content, offering subscriptions and e-commerce sales of their publications. The website is professionally designed and provides clear navigation and relevant content for its niche market. Technically, the site is built on the Webnode CMS platform, leveraging Amazon Cloudfront CDN for content delivery and integrating modern tracking and consent management tools such as Google Tag Manager and Iubenda. The site is mobile optimized and uses HTTPS for secure communications.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching espritbohemia.cz

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention espritbohemia.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for espritbohemia.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a small media publisher within the Czech Republic, focusing on magazine publishing and subscription services. Its business model revolves around content creation and direct sales through an online e-shop. The presence of multiple magazine titles indicates a diversified product portfolio within the publishing sector. The use of professional privacy and cookie policies suggests compliance awareness. However, the absence of visible contact details on the homepage may limit direct customer engagement. The company appears to maintain a consistent brand identity and targets a broad demographic interested in lifestyle and family content.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and the use of a consent management platform to comply with privacy regulations. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are not detected, which could enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found in the HTML content. The lack of published security policies or incident response information indicates room for improvement in transparency and preparedness. Overall, the security measures are adequate for the business type but could be strengthened to improve resilience and trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify comprehensive security headers including CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against web attacks.
  2. Publish clear security and incident response policies on the website to improve transparency and customer trust.
  3. Add visible and verified contact information such as company email and phone numbers to facilitate customer support and inquiries.
  4. Conduct regular security audits to identify and remediate potential vulnerabilities and ensure compliance with evolving regulations.
  5. Consider obtaining and displaying relevant certifications or trust badges to reinforce business credibility and security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ESPRIT BOHEMIA s.r.o.
Description
Vydavatelství časopisů TVOŘÍME s láskou, RITUALS, ESTETIKA, PERFECT WOMAN, Sofie a Sofie Bydlení. Publishes various magazines and offers subscriptions.
Key services
Magazine publishing, Magazine subscriptions, E-shop for magazines
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Iubenda Cookie Solution, Cloudfront CDN, Webnode CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of consent management platform (Iubenda)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Pinterest Core
Marketing tools
Iubenda Cookie Consent
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  3. Website uses HTTPS and modern tracking and consent tools.
  4. Content is relevant to magazine publishing and subscription sales.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage.
  6. Privacy and cookie policies are implemented via Iubenda.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies found.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt detected.
  9. Website is built on Webnode CMS and uses Amazon Cloudfront CDN.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webnode CMS platform, utilizing Amazon Cloudfront CDN for efficient content delivery. It employs modern JavaScript libraries and integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing tracking. The site uses Iubenda for cookie consent and privacy policy management, indicating a focus on regulatory compliance. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. There is an opportunity to improve technical robustness by adding security headers and enhancing accessibility compliance. The absence of WHOIS data is a technical concern that should be investigated to ensure domain legitimacy.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with espritbohemia.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review espritbohemia.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.