Skip to main content

Security report for esnonursespool.eu

European Specialist Nurses Organisation · Healthcare · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The ESNO Nurses Survey Pool website serves as a dedicated platform for specialist nurses across Europe to participate in surveys, share expertise, and network. It is an initiative of the European Specialist Nurses Organisation (ESNO), aiming to empower nurses by providing a voice and facilitating data-driven insights for policy and scientific purposes. The website is well-structured, professionally designed, and optimized for SEO and mobile devices, reflecting a mature digital presence in the healthcare sector. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins such as Yoast SEO and integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics. The use of HTTPS and security headers indicates a good security posture, although there is room for improvement in publishing explicit security policies and incident response information. The cookie consent mechanism is implemented in compliance with GDPR standards, enhancing privacy compliance. Security-wise, the website demonstrates solid practices with no evident vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy or vulnerability disclosure page suggests an opportunity to strengthen transparency and incident readiness. The WHOIS data aligns well with the website's claims, showing consistent registration details without privacy protection, supporting the site's legitimacy. Overall, the ESNO Nurses Survey Pool website is a credible, secure, and user-friendly platform that effectively serves its niche audience. Strategic enhancements in security documentation and contact transparency could further elevate trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching esnonursespool.eu

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions ESNO as a niche community platform focused on specialist nurses in Europe, leveraging surveys and data collection to influence nursing policy and scientific research. Its business model centers on community engagement without direct monetization visible on the site. The platform targets specialist nurses, aiming to grow its membership and represent diverse nursing fields. The presence of social media channels and structured data indicates an active digital marketing approach. The lack of explicit business contact emails or phone numbers suggests a preference for controlled communication via forms. The platform's growth potential lies in expanding survey offerings and enhancing nurse participation across Europe.

Security posture

The website exhibits a good security maturity level with enforced HTTPS, presence of key security headers, and a GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanism. No exposed credentials or sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of reputable third-party services like Google Tag Manager is noted, though continuous monitoring for vulnerabilities in these dependencies is recommended. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contacts limits transparency. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file was found, which could be added to improve security culture and readiness. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from enhanced documentation and proactive communication channels.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Add incident response contact information, such as a security@ or abuse@ email address.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to improve inclusivity.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Registration number
Chamber of Commerce
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
European Specialist Nurses Organisation
Description
The ESNO Nurses Survey Pool is an initiative by the European Specialist Nurses Organisation (ESNO) to create a portal for nurses across all specialties to engage in surveys, data collection, and networking. It aims to give nurses a voice in their professional expertise, science, education, and experience.
Key services
Survey participation, Data collection, Networking among specialist nurses
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Swiper.js
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on specialist nursing community engagement and surveys.
  3. Good implementation of privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
  5. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found; contact is via form.
  6. Social media presence is linked and consistent with organization.
  7. No visible security or privacy red flags.
  8. No terms of service page detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS, utilizing modern plugins like Yoast SEO for search optimization and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The front-end employs jQuery and Swiper.js for interactive elements. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and includes accessibility considerations, though these could be improved. Performance is moderate, with no critical loading issues detected. The use of structured data (JSON-LD) enhances SEO and content discoverability. Hosting details are not explicitly disclosed, but the domain is registered with a reputable registrar. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business goals effectively with opportunities for modernization and enhanced accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with esnonursespool.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review esnonursespool.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.