Skip to main content

Security report for erzsebetfurdo.hu

Erzsébet Fürdő Gyógyászati és Szűrőközpont · Healthcare · Hungary

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Erzsébet Fürdő Gyógyászati és Szűrőközpont is a well-established private healthcare provider in Hungary offering a broad range of medical services including ophthalmology, gynecology, dentistry, surgery, and diagnostic testing. The website reflects a professional and comprehensive healthcare institution targeting Hungarian patients seeking private medical care. The business operates multiple related domains indicating a diversified healthcare service offering including a one-day surgery center and an online shop. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with Elementor, leveraging modern web technologies and integrating analytics and marketing tools with appropriate consent mechanisms. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data, though security headers are missing and could be improved. Privacy compliance is strong with accessible privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and safe for general audiences.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching erzsebetfurdo.hu

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a strong market position as one of Hungary's most comprehensive private healthcare providers. Its business model focuses on delivering specialized medical services supported by a network of related domains and partnerships such as NewLab pathology lab. The target customers are Hungarian individuals seeking private healthcare solutions. The presence of Trustpilot and Google reviews indicates active reputation management. The business demonstrates growth potential through diversified services and digital presence. Strategic partnerships and clear contact information enhance credibility and customer trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and no visible sensitive data leaks. The use of cookie consent and privacy policies aligns with GDPR requirements. However, the absence of security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents an area for improvement. No incident response or security policy information is published, which could enhance transparency and readiness. The integration of third-party analytics and marketing scripts is managed with consent, reducing privacy risks. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from additional hardening and documented policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins for vulnerabilities and update them promptly.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Continue monitoring privacy compliance and update cookie and data protection notices as regulations evolve.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Erzsébet Fürdő Gyógyászati és Szűrőközpont
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Erzsébet Fürdő Gyógyászati és Szűrőközpont
Description
Az Erzsébet Fürdő Gyógyászati -és Szűrőközpont Magyarország egyik legátfogóbb szolgáltatását nyújtó magán-egészségügyi intézménye.
Key services
Szemészeti műtétek, Gyomortükrözés és vastagbéltükrözés, Nőgyógyászat, Fogászat, Meddőségi, reprodukciós szaktanácsadás, Addiktológiai tanácsadás, DEXA csontsűrűség vizsgálat, Általános sebészet, Érsebészet, Fül-orr-gégészet
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, jQuery, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Trustpilot widget, Bootstrap Icons
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel with consent
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Trustpilot
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, Trustpilot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional private healthcare provider in Hungary.
  2. Content is comprehensive and well-structured with clear navigation.
  3. Multiple related domains indicate a network of healthcare services.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented and accessible.
  5. No security headers detected; opportunity for security improvements.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and CMS (WordPress with Elementor).
  7. Active use of analytics and marketing tools with consent mechanisms.
  8. No adult or questionable content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using Elementor for page building, supported by jQuery and Bootstrap Icons for UI elements. It integrates Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Trustpilot widgets for analytics and marketing purposes. The site loads CSS and JS assets asynchronously and uses caching and optimization plugins to improve performance. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO meta tags are properly configured. However, the site lacks some security headers and could improve accessibility compliance. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid with room for security and accessibility enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with erzsebetfurdo.hu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review erzsebetfurdo.hu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.