Skip to main content

Security report for errotica-archives.com

MetArt Network · Media · Finland

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Errotica Archives is a premium adult content website specializing in erotic nude photography and videos, operated under the MetArt Network umbrella. The site offers a subscription-based model with frequent updates, live cams, and a broad catalog of galleries and movies featuring high-quality erotic art. The platform targets adult audiences seeking artistic and explicit content with a focus on natural beauty and professional presentation. Technically, the site leverages modern web technologies including React, Bootstrap, and integrates analytics and consent management tools such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Mixpanel, and OneTrust. The website is well-optimized for mobile devices and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and professional design. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS, uses age verification, and integrates reCAPTCHA to mitigate abuse. However, explicit security headers are not clearly visible in the HTML source, suggesting room for improvement. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain reduces trust slightly but is mitigated by the site's association with the reputable MetArt Network. Overall, the site demonstrates a mature digital presence with strong content quality and privacy compliance, suitable for its niche market.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching errotica-archives.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
75
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention errotica-archives.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
278
Employees
0
Customers
278
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
39%

7 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for errotica-archives.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The MetArt Network, operating Errotica Archives, holds a strong market position in the premium erotic media sector, offering a wide range of sister sites catering to various adult content niches. The business model relies on subscription revenue, affiliate marketing, and promotional campaigns. The network's extensive portfolio and consistent branding provide competitive advantages and customer retention. The target audience is adult consumers seeking high-quality erotic photography and videos. The network's partnership ecosystem includes live cam providers and payment processors, enhancing service offerings. Growth indicators include frequent content updates and promotional sales. Strategic observations highlight the importance of maintaining privacy compliance and enhancing security posture to sustain trust and market leadership.

Security posture

The website exhibits a solid security foundation with HTTPS enforcement, age verification mechanisms, and integration of Google reCAPTCHA and OneTrust for consent management. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options in the visible HTML source suggests potential gaps in defense-in-depth. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The absence of a public security policy or incident response contact limits transparency. Compliance with GDPR is indicated by privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security maturity is good but could benefit from enhanced header configurations and published security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify comprehensive security headers including CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen browser security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Maintain and update privacy and cookie policies to ensure ongoing GDPR and global privacy compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MetArt Network
Description
Errotica Archives is part of the MetArt Network offering premium erotic nude photography and videos featuring the world’s most beautiful models. The site provides updates on new content including galleries and movies, targeting adult audiences interested in high-quality erotic art.
Key services
Erotic photo galleries, Erotic videos, Live cams, Membership subscriptions
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, JavaScript, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Bootstrap, JWPlayer, OneTrust Cookie Consent, Mixpanel, Cloudflare CDN (implied by domain and scripts)
Frameworks
React
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Age verification for certain countries and states
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA
  • Consent management via OneTrust

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Mixpanel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Streamate
Tracking pixels
Mixpanel, OneTrust
Marketing tools
Mixpanel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is part of a large adult content network with multiple sister sites.
  2. Content is professionally presented with clear navigation and up-to-date updates.
  3. Strong use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact is via support portal.
  6. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual but may be due to privacy protection.
  7. No WAF or blocking detected; site fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React framework with Bootstrap for styling, ensuring responsive and mobile-friendly design. It uses Google Analytics and Tag Manager for analytics, Mixpanel for user behavior tracking, and OneTrust for cookie consent management. The use of JWPlayer indicates video streaming capabilities. The site loads resources from multiple CDNs, improving performance. The technical implementation is robust with good SEO practices including meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization in image loading and script management. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or headless architecture. The technical risks are low but monitoring third-party scripts is advised to avoid supply chain vulnerabilities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with errotica-archives.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review errotica-archives.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.