Skip to main content

Security report for eroticlinks.net

Media · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

EroticLinks.net is an adult content aggregator and affiliate marketing website established in 2003. It provides daily updated erotic picture galleries and links to various free pornographic websites. The site targets an adult audience seeking free erotic content and related affiliate offers. The business model relies heavily on affiliate referrals and advertising revenue from adult networks. Technically, the site uses basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript without modern frameworks or CMS, resulting in a basic user experience with limited mobile optimization and accessibility. Security posture is weak, lacking HTTPS enforcement, security headers, and privacy compliance mechanisms. No privacy policy, cookie consent, or contact information is provided, which raises compliance and trust concerns. The domain registration is consistent with the site's age and content, registered through a reputable registrar without privacy protection. Overall, the site operates as a small-scale adult affiliate directory with basic technical and security maturity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching eroticlinks.net

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website occupies a niche in the adult entertainment affiliate marketing sector, focusing on free erotic galleries and linking to partner adult sites. Its competitive advantage lies in its long-standing domain and extensive curated links. Revenue streams are primarily from affiliate commissions and adult advertising networks. The target customers are adults seeking free erotic content. The partnership ecosystem includes multiple adult content providers and affiliate programs. Growth indicators are limited due to the site's basic design and lack of modern features. Strategic observations suggest the site could improve by enhancing compliance, security, and user experience to maintain relevance in a competitive adult market.

Security posture

The security maturity level of EroticLinks.net is low. The site lacks HTTPS enforcement visible in the HTML content, does not implement security headers, and sets cookies without user consent, exposing it to privacy and security risks. There are no visible incident response or security policies, and no contact channels for abuse or security issues. Compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations is absent. The lack of privacy and cookie policies further exacerbates compliance gaps. The site is vulnerable to potential man-in-the-middle attacks and user tracking without consent. Overall, the security posture requires significant improvements to protect users and comply with regulations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with a user consent mechanism to comply with GDPR.
  3. Introduce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Provide clear contact information and establish an incident response process including abuse and security contacts.
  5. Improve website design for mobile optimization and accessibility to enhance user experience and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Daily updated huge collection of erotic pictures and links to free porn sites
Key services
Erotic picture galleries, Links to free porn sites, Affiliate referrals
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML, JavaScript, CSS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
poor
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
adultfriendfinder.com
Tracking pixels
sextracker.com
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult content link directory with affiliate marketing
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found
  3. No contact or security policies provided
  4. No HTTPS enforcement visible in HTML content
  5. Content is explicit adult material without age verification
  6. Numerous external affiliate links to adult sites
  7. Basic website design and navigation
  8. Cookies are set without user consent
  9. No modern frameworks or CMS detected
  10. No social media or company contact information found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript without modern frameworks or CMS platforms. It relies on static content with affiliate links and minimal interactivity. Performance is moderate but could be improved with modern optimization techniques. The site lacks mobile responsiveness and accessibility features, limiting usability on various devices. There is no evidence of advanced analytics or tracking technologies beyond basic cookies and affiliate tracking pixels. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified beyond the registrar information. Technical debt is evident due to outdated design and lack of modern web standards, posing risks to user engagement and SEO effectiveness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with eroticlinks.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review eroticlinks.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.