Skip to main content

Security report for erosberry.com

Media · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Erosberry.com is an adult content website offering free nude pictures, erotic videos, and model galleries. The site targets adult audiences interested in erotic and pornographic visual content, operating primarily through advertising and affiliate marketing. The business model focuses on providing free content to attract visitors and monetize through ads and affiliate links. The website is updated frequently with fresh content, indicating active maintenance and content management. Technically, the site uses standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and integrates analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Ahrefs Analytics. The site is mobile optimized with a clear navigation structure, providing a good user experience. However, there is no detected CMS or hosting provider information, and performance is moderate. Security posture shows basic HTTPS usage but lacks important security headers and explicit privacy or cookie policies, which are critical for compliance and user trust. The absence of WHOIS data is a significant concern, as it reduces the trustworthiness of the domain registration and raises questions about legitimacy. Overall, the site functions well for its purpose but requires improvements in privacy compliance, security best practices, and transparency to enhance credibility and reduce risk.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching erosberry.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
58
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Erosberry.com operates in the adult media sector, providing free erotic and pornographic content to a niche audience. Its competitive advantage lies in aggregating a wide variety of content from multiple channels and categories, appealing to diverse user preferences. The business model relies heavily on advertising networks such as JuicyAds and affiliate programs like Tantaly. The site also leverages third-party analytics for traffic insights. The target customer segment is adult users seeking free erotic content. Growth indicators include frequent content updates and partnerships with multiple affiliate and advertising platforms. The partnership ecosystem includes adult ad networks and content providers. Strategic observations suggest the site could benefit from enhanced compliance and security measures to sustain growth and user trust in a highly regulated industry.

Security posture

The current security maturity level of erosberry.com is basic. The site uses HTTPS, which is mandatory, but lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content, but the absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps, particularly with GDPR. There is no visible incident response or security contact information, which limits the site's readiness to handle security incidents. The use of multiple third-party scripts increases the attack surface and necessitates regular security audits. Overall, the security posture is functional but requires significant improvements in policy transparency, header implementation, and incident response readiness to align with industry best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish clear contact information including security and abuse contacts to improve incident response capabilities and user trust.
  4. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider registering WHOIS information transparently or using justified privacy protection to improve domain legitimacy and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Free nude pics of adult nude women and naked models. Explore erotic and porn galleries with beautiful nude girls, updated daily with high-quality content.
Key services
Free nude photo galleries, Erotic and pornographic videos, Model profiles, Affiliate advertising
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Ahrefs Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Ahrefs Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
JuicyAds
Tracking pixels
Ahrefs Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website hosts adult content with free galleries and videos.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers detected.
  4. Uses multiple third-party analytics and advertising networks.
  5. No visible security headers or advanced security policies.
  6. WHOIS data is missing, which is suspicious for an active site.
  7. Site is mobile optimized and has good navigation structure.
  8. Content is updated frequently with recent dates in 2025.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, with integration of Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Ahrefs Analytics for traffic and SEO analysis. The site is mobile optimized and features a responsive design with clear navigation menus and categorized content. Performance is moderate, with preloading of key assets and fonts to improve load times. No CMS or hosting provider details were detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Accessibility features are basic, with room for improvement. The site uses multiple external domains for content delivery and advertising, which should be monitored for security and privacy compliance. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with erosberry.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review erosberry.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.