Skip to main content

Security report for erocurves.com

Erocurves.com · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Erocurves.com operates as an adult content aggregator specializing in erotic and nude photography, targeting an adult audience interested in softcore imagery. The website offers daily updated galleries and categorizes content by themes and models, linking extensively to partner and affiliate sites. The business model relies on content aggregation and affiliate marketing within the adult entertainment sector. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with common plugins for contact forms and dark mode features, leveraging jQuery and Google Analytics for user interaction and tracking. The site demonstrates moderate SEO optimization and basic mobile responsiveness but lacks advanced accessibility features. Security posture is basic; HTTPS is enabled but no advanced security headers are present, and no privacy or cookie policies are visible, indicating potential compliance gaps. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a significant concern, reducing trust in domain legitimacy. Overall, the site functions adequately for its niche but requires improvements in security, privacy compliance, and transparency to enhance trustworthiness and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching erocurves.com

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
40
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions itself as a niche player in the adult media industry, focusing on erotic and nude content aggregation. Its competitive advantage lies in daily fresh content and a broad network of affiliate and partner sites, which likely generate revenue through referral commissions. The target customers are adult users seeking softcore erotic imagery, with no direct sales or subscription model evident on the homepage. The partnership ecosystem includes multiple adult content and discount sites, enhancing its market reach. Growth indicators are limited due to lack of business transparency and absence of company registration details. The business operates at a small scale with a focus on content curation rather than original production.

Security posture

The security maturity of Erocurves.com is low to moderate. While HTTPS is enforced, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS exposes the site to common web vulnerabilities. The contact form lacks visible anti-bot protections, increasing risk of spam or abuse. No incident response or security policy information is provided, indicating limited preparedness for security events. The absence of privacy and cookie policies suggests non-compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations. The missing WHOIS data further undermines domain trust and raises questions about ownership transparency. Overall, the site should prioritize implementing security best practices and compliance measures to reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies with explicit GDPR compliance statements to improve legal adherence and user trust.
  3. Add CAPTCHA or other anti-bot mechanisms on contact forms to prevent spam and abuse.
  4. Investigate and resolve WHOIS registration data issues to improve domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  5. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain platform security.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Erocurves.com
Description
Hot nude girls and erotic softcore models. Erocurves.com brings you beautiful nudes and sexy naked babes every single day.
Key services
Erotic photo galleries, Model archives, Category-based browsing
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Darkmysite plugin, Very Simple Contact Form plugin, Widget Options plugin, WP Rocket
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • External links open in new windows with noopener

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (gtag.js)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult content aggregator with daily updated erotic images.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage.
  3. Contact available only via a contact form; no direct emails or phone numbers found.
  4. No security headers detected; HTTPS is enabled but security posture is basic.
  5. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  6. External links mostly point to adult content partner sites and affiliate programs.
  7. Google Analytics is used for tracking without visible privacy disclosures.
  8. Website uses WordPress with several plugins including dark mode and contact form.
  9. No social media links or company registration details found.
  10. Design and UX are basic with moderate SEO optimization.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 5.8.10 with plugins such as Darkmysite for dark mode, Very Simple Contact Form, Widget Options, and WP Rocket for performance optimization. It uses jQuery 1.9.0 and custom JavaScript for UI interactions like infinite scrolling and external link handling. The site loads resources from its own CDN subdomain (cdn.erocurves.com) for images and assets, which aids performance. SEO is supported by All In One SEO Pack with JSON-LD structured data describing the organization and website. The site is moderately optimized for mobile but lacks advanced accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with some scope for improvement in modernizing the tech stack and enhancing mobile responsiveness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with erocurves.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review erocurves.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.