Skip to main content

Security report for equator-network.org

EQUATOR Network · Healthcare · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The EQUATOR Network is a globally recognized non-profit organization dedicated to improving the quality and transparency of health research reporting. It offers a comprehensive library of reporting guidelines, educational toolkits, training courses, and resources aimed at researchers, journal editors, and healthcare professionals. The website reflects a strong market position supported by partnerships with reputable organizations and endorsements from major medical journals. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with common web technologies such as jQuery, Google Analytics, and Cookiebot for consent management. While the site is well-structured and mobile-optimized, it uses an outdated jQuery version which poses a minor security risk. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, but lacks advanced security headers and a public security policy. Privacy compliance is strong with clear policies and GDPR adherence. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional, though WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection, which is justified for this type of organization.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching equator-network.org

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

EQUATOR Network operates in the healthcare and education sectors as a non-profit entity focused on research quality improvement. Its business model centers on providing free resources, training, and advocacy rather than commercial sales. The organization targets health researchers, peer reviewers, and journal editors worldwide. Its partnerships with major health research funders and journals enhance its credibility and reach. The website content and endorsements indicate a stable and reputable presence in the global health research community. Growth is supported by ongoing collaborations and educational initiatives. The absence of direct contact emails suggests a preference for managed communication via contact forms.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to strong security posture with mandatory HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms in place. However, the use of an outdated jQuery library (version 1.8.3) introduces potential vulnerabilities. No advanced security headers were detected, and there is no publicly available security policy or incident response contact information. The lack of a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy limits transparency for security researchers. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities were found in the HTML content. Overall, the site is secure for general use but could improve by updating libraries, implementing security headers, and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Update jQuery and other third-party libraries to current secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and provide incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
  4. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  5. Enhance form security with CAPTCHA or other anti-bot measures to prevent abuse.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
EQUATOR Network
Description
The EQUATOR Network is a global initiative aimed at enhancing the quality and transparency of health research by providing a comprehensive library of reporting guidelines, toolkits, training courses, and resources to improve research reporting and publication.
Key services
Comprehensive searchable database of reporting guidelines, Educational toolkits for writing and peer reviewing research, Training courses and events, Support for guideline development and implementation, Newsletter and news updates
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.8.3, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, FlexSlider, Modernizr, WordPress
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and analytics scripts asynchronously

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot session tracker
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. No WHOIS data available due to malformed WHOIS response
  3. Strong focus on health research reporting and education
  4. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms
  5. Use of outdated jQuery version is a minor technical risk
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers publicly listed, only contact form
  7. Multiple endorsements and funding partners from reputable organizations
  8. No visible security headers detected in provided data
  9. No evidence of security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using a combination of legacy and modern web technologies including jQuery 1.8.3, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot for cookie consent, and FlexSlider for UI components. The site is mobile responsive and includes accessibility features such as skip links. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. However, the use of an outdated jQuery version indicates technical debt and potential security risk. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business goals but would benefit from modernization and enhanced security practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with equator-network.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review equator-network.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.