Skip to main content

Security report for epet.sk

EP Energy Trading · Energy · Slovakia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

EP Energy Trading operates as a medium-sized energy supplier focused on providing electricity and gas services primarily in Slovakia and the Czech Republic. The company is part of the larger EPH energy group, which lends it stability and market credibility. Their website emphasizes reliable energy delivery, customer satisfaction, and ease of switching suppliers, targeting both residential and business customers. The digital presence is professional and well-structured, supporting their business goals effectively. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager, jQuery, and Google reCAPTCHA, ensuring a functional and moderately optimized user experience. The site is mobile-friendly and includes SEO best practices such as meta tags and structured data. However, some improvements could be made in accessibility and security headers to enhance overall robustness. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and implements bot protection via reCAPTCHA. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is evident through the presence of a privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism, though terms of service and incident response information are absent. The WHOIS data aligns well with the business identity, supporting legitimacy. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional front for EP Energy Trading, with moderate technical sophistication and good security hygiene. Strategic enhancements in security policies and accessibility could further strengthen their posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Cloudflare, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching epet.sk

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
70
Email security
60
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

EP Energy Trading holds a stable position in the energy sector as part of the EPH group, serving a broad customer base with electricity and gas supply. Their competitive advantages include affiliation with a strong parent company, customer-centric service, and simplified administrative processes for switching suppliers. The business model revolves around energy sales and customer support, targeting both households and corporate clients. The company leverages digital channels for marketing and customer engagement, including social media presence on Facebook. Growth indicators include claims of high customer satisfaction and clear communication of pricing and contract information. Partnerships appear limited to social media and standard web services, with no explicit third-party business partners identified.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and use of Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate automated abuse. No critical security headers were detected, representing an area for improvement. There is no public security policy or incident response contact information, which limits transparency and readiness perception. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. Privacy compliance is supported by a privacy policy and cookie consent banner, indicating awareness of GDPR requirements. Overall, the security maturity is good but could benefit from enhanced header policies, published security documentation, and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Publish a clear terms of service page to define user agreements and legal protections.
  3. Add a security policy page and provide incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ emails.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to improve compliance with standards and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities or outdated components.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
EP Energy Trading
Description
EP Energy Trading provides energy supply services focusing on electricity and gas with an emphasis on reliable energy delivery and customer service.
Key services
Electricity supply, Gas supply, Customer support, Contract management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, jQuery 3.6.0, Google reCAPTCHA, WebFont Loader, CookieConsent v3.0.3
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure form input (search form)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented in Slovak and Czech languages.
  3. Clear focus on energy supply services with customer-centric messaging.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and tracking tools.
  5. No visible security or privacy policy gaps except missing terms of service and incident response info.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack with asynchronous loading of Google Tag Manager, jQuery 3.6.0, Google reCAPTCHA, and WebFont Loader for custom fonts. CSS is optimized with preload hints and fallback mechanisms. The site is responsive and mobile-optimized with a clean layout and structured navigation. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in caching and resource optimization. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The technical implementation supports good SEO and user experience but lacks advanced accessibility features and security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with epet.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review epet.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.