Skip to main content

Security report for envirofloeng.com

Enviroflo Engineering · Energy · United Kingdom

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

44/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Enviroflo Engineering is a UK-based engineering company specializing in dust control solutions for the mineral extraction industry. As a subsidiary of Ecolab and partner of Nalco, it offers dust extraction and suppression systems globally, targeting mining, quarrying, asphalt, and biomass energy sectors. The company has a niche market position with a focused B2B business model and a domain age consistent with its operational history since 2006. The website content is relevant and professional, though it lacks modern web technologies and comprehensive compliance documentation. Technically, the site is basic with HTML and CSS, moderate performance, and limited mobile optimization. Security posture is moderate but could be improved by enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, and confirming HTTPS usage. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance features.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching envirofloeng.com

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
50
Average
44

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Enviroflo Engineering operates in the energy sector, providing specialized dust control engineering services. Its competitive advantage lies in its affiliation with Ecolab and Nalco, leveraging their global reach and expertise. The business model focuses on supplying engineered solutions to industrial clients in mining and related sectors. Revenue streams likely come from equipment sales, system installations, and maintenance services. The target customers are industrial operators requiring dust control solutions. The partnership ecosystem includes Nalco and Ecolab, enhancing credibility and market access. Growth indicators include recent project commissions such as the Rail Wagon Dust Suppression System in Africa. The company maintains a consistent brand presence but lacks extensive digital marketing or social media engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security maturity level. No HTTPS or SSL information was provided, which is a critical gap. No security headers were detected, and DNSSEC is not enabled, exposing the domain to potential DNS attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published, limiting transparency. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found, which is positive. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and other regulations. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires significant improvements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Enable HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce HTTPS site-wide.
  2. Implement DNSSEC to secure DNS infrastructure and prevent spoofing.
  3. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  5. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Enviroflo Engineering
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Enviroflo Engineering
Description
Enviroflo Engineering, an Ecolab company, are dust control engineers to the minerals extraction industry. Based in the UK, they supply dust extraction and dust suppression systems worldwide to the mining, quarrying, asphalt and biomass energy industries.
Key services
Dust extraction systems, Dust suppression systems, Dustfoam suppression, Bag filters, Venturi scrubbers, Rail wagon dust suppression
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML, CSS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. No privacy or cookie policy found on site.
  2. No terms of service page detected.
  3. Contact information limited to postal address and contact form; no phone or email explicitly listed.
  4. No social media links found.
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  6. Website uses basic HTML and CSS, no modern frameworks or CMS detected.
  7. No security headers or advanced security configurations detected.
  8. WHOIS data shows domain is stable and consistent with business claims.
  9. Website content is relevant and professional but lacks modern features and compliance documentation.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using basic HTML and CSS without modern frameworks or CMS platforms. It lacks mobile optimization beyond basic levels and has moderate performance. SEO is supported by meta keywords and descriptions but could be enhanced with structured data and Open Graph tags, which are absent. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal user tracking. Hosting is via Netregistry Wholesale Pty Ltd, consistent with WHOIS data. The site shows no signs of technical debt but would benefit from modernization to improve user experience, accessibility, and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with envirofloeng.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review envirofloeng.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.