Skip to main content

Security report for enteraledomicile.fr

NUTRICIA · Healthcare · France

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website 'Entérale à domicile' serves as an informational and support platform dedicated to patients undergoing enteral nutrition at home, their caregivers, and healthcare providers. It is affiliated with Nutricia, a recognized nutrition company, and provides educational content, practical advice, video testimonials, and specialized resources for children and polyhandicap patients. The site targets the French healthcare market and aims to facilitate better management of enteral nutrition in a home setting. Technically, the website is built on WordPress, utilizing modern libraries such as jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and reCAPTCHA for security and analytics. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices and structured data for enhanced search engine visibility. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in accessibility features. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and employs cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies or incident response information. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Privacy compliance is strong, with clear privacy and cookie policies aligned with GDPR requirements. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy digital presence with a strong focus on patient education and support. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain registration insights, but the affiliation with Nutricia and the quality of content support a high legitimacy score. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing security policies, and improving accessibility to further strengthen the site's security posture and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching enteraledomicile.fr

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
80
Email security
50
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website occupies a niche position within the healthcare sector, focusing on home enteral nutrition patient support. Its competitive advantage lies in its affiliation with Nutricia, providing authoritative and specialized content. The business model is informational and supportive rather than transactional, targeting patients, caregivers, and healthcare professionals. Revenue streams are likely indirect, supporting Nutricia's brand and product ecosystem. The partnership ecosystem includes recognized healthcare organizations such as NACRE, AFSOS, and SFNCM. Growth indicators include comprehensive content offerings and multimedia resources. Strategic observations suggest potential for expanding interactive services or direct patient engagement tools.

Security posture

The current security maturity is moderate to good. HTTPS is enforced, and cookie consent is implemented, indicating awareness of privacy and security standards. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents a gap. No incident response or security policy documentation is publicly available, which could hinder rapid response to security events. Data protection practices appear compliant with GDPR, but no dedicated Data Protection Officer contact was found. The site uses Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate automated abuse. Overall, the security culture is adequate but could benefit from formalized policies and enhanced technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible to users and stakeholders.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to minimize vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all audiences.
  5. Consider adding explicit Data Protection Officer contact information to strengthen GDPR compliance and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
NUTRICIA
Description
Entérale à domicile informe et accompagne les patients en nutrition entérale dans la vie à domicile. Nutricia s'engage à vos côtés et vous accompagne
Key services
Patient information and education on enteral nutrition, Support for daily life with enteral nutrition, Video resources and testimonials, Specialized content for children and polyhandicap patients
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.6.4, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, reCAPTCHA, Yoast SEO plugin, WPBakery Page Builder, WordPress
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads (AW-701544610)
Marketing tools
TagCommander
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content
  2. No WHOIS data available from AFNIC server (domain possibly private or not registered)
  3. Strong affiliation with Nutricia brand
  4. Good privacy and cookie compliance
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics
  6. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in HTML
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages a WordPress CMS with common plugins including Yoast SEO and WPBakery Page Builder, indicating a standard but effective content management approach. The tech stack includes jQuery 3.6.4, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and Google reCAPTCHA, reflecting modern web analytics and security practices. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in load times and accessibility. The site is mobile-optimized and uses structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO enhancement. No hosting provider details were discernible from the HTML content. Technical risks include potential plugin vulnerabilities if not regularly updated and missing security headers that could expose the site to certain attacks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with enteraledomicile.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review enteraledomicile.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.