Skip to main content

Security report for entensity.net

Entensity.net · Media · N/a

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Entensity.net is a niche adult and humor entertainment website operating since 2002, offering daily updated funny videos, pictures, jokes, and extensive adult content links. The business model relies heavily on affiliate marketing and advertising partnerships with adult cam sites and content providers. The website targets adult audiences interested in humorous and explicit media content. Technically, the site uses basic web technologies including JavaScript, CSS, and video.js for media playback, with Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. The design and user experience are functional but dated, with limited mobile optimization and accessibility features. Security posture is weak, lacking HTTPS enforcement, security headers, and cookie consent mechanisms, exposing the site to potential risks and compliance issues. WHOIS data indicates a legitimate, long-standing domain registration consistent with the website's claims. Overall, the site operates with basic professionalism but requires significant improvements in security and privacy compliance to enhance trust and user safety.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching entensity.net

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
58
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website occupies a niche in adult entertainment and humor content aggregation, leveraging affiliate partnerships with major adult content platforms such as MyFreeCams, xHamster, and OnlyFans. Its revenue streams are primarily advertising and affiliate commissions. The site maintains a loyal audience through daily content updates and user submissions. However, the lack of clear company contact information and minimal corporate transparency limits its business credibility. The partnership ecosystem is extensive within the adult content industry, but the site does not appear to have formal certifications or security policies, which may impact growth and regulatory compliance. Strategic opportunities include enhancing privacy compliance, improving security posture, and modernizing the user experience to attract a broader audience.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is low. The absence of HTTPS enforcement and security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options increases vulnerability to common web attacks. The site uses multiple external scripts from adult and advertising domains, which may introduce risks if not properly vetted. No incident response or security contact information is provided, indicating limited readiness for security events. GDPR compliance is not evident, and no cookie consent mechanism is implemented, exposing the site to potential regulatory penalties. The overall security culture appears minimal, with no visible adoption of recognized frameworks or certifications. Immediate remediation is recommended to address these gaps and protect user data.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with strong TLS configuration and enforce it site-wide.
  2. Add comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Deploy a cookie consent banner and update privacy policies to reflect GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  4. Conduct a security audit of all third-party scripts and remove or sandbox risky content.
  5. Establish clear security incident response contacts and publish a security policy to enhance trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Entensity.net
Description
Entertainment website featuring daily updated funny videos, pictures, jokes, and adult content.
Key services
Daily updated funny videos and pictures, Adult content links and referrals, User submitted content, Forums
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS, HTML5, Video.js, Google Tag Manager
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
poor
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
TwinRedEngine
Marketing tools
Google Analytics (via GTM)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website hosts adult and humorous content with frequent updates.
  2. Heavy use of external adult content links and affiliate marketing.
  3. No HTTPS enforcement visible in provided data; security headers missing.
  4. No cookie consent or GDPR compliance mechanisms detected.
  5. WHOIS data is public and consistent with website claims.
  6. Website design and UX are basic and dated.
  7. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found.
  8. Multiple external adult domains linked, indicating affiliate revenue model.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional HTML and JavaScript stack with video.js for media playback and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site lacks modern frameworks or CMS platforms, indicating a custom or legacy build. Performance is moderate but could benefit from optimization and mobile responsiveness improvements. The absence of accessibility features and minimal SEO optimization limit reach and usability. Hosting details are not explicit, but the domain is registered with eNom, LLC. Technical debt is evident in dated design and lack of security best practices. Modernization opportunities include adopting responsive design, improving accessibility compliance, and integrating a CMS for easier content management.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with entensity.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review entensity.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.