Skip to main content

Security report for enseco.sk

enseco.sk · Energy · Slovakia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

42/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ENSECO is a Slovakian company specializing in turnkey technological solutions primarily for the energy sector. Their website presents a professional B2B service model offering comprehensive services including EPC projects, engineering, electrical activities, control systems, manufacturing, and quality control. The company appears to have a solid regional market position with a medium-sized business profile. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using modern plugins such as Elementor and Yoast SEO, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms in place, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit incident response information. No blocking or WAF mechanisms interfere with content accessibility. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but could improve privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching enseco.sk

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
45
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
42

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets industrial and energy sector clients with a focus on delivering complex technological systems and services. Their business model is service-oriented, emphasizing project management, engineering, and technical execution. The website content and structure suggest a mature business with established partnerships and certifications, although explicit details on company founding year or parent/subsidiary relationships are not provided. The presence of a LinkedIn profile and certification pages adds to credibility. The company leverages digital marketing tools like Google Analytics and Tag Manager, indicating a moderate digital maturity.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and a GDPR-compliant cookie consent plugin, reflecting baseline security and privacy awareness. However, the absence of a privacy policy, terms of service, security policy, and incident response contact reduces compliance and transparency. No advanced security headers such as CSP or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics and Tag Manager is managed with consent but requires ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is moderate but can be significantly improved with better policies and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement a security.txt file and provide clear incident response contact information to enhance security transparency.
  3. Add and enforce advanced security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party plugins and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
enseco.sk
Description
Zverte svoj projekt do rúk odborníkov na technologické celky a systémy nielen v jadre. Komplexné služby od projektu až po uvedenie do prevádzky.
Key services
EPC projekty, Inžiniering, Elektro činnosti, SKR (I&C), Výroba a montáž, Kontrola kvality
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Astra Theme, Yoast SEO, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, WebToffee GDPR Cookie Consent
Frameworks
WordPress CMS
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Google Tag Manager with consent management
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional B2B service provider in the energy sector
  2. Content is well structured with comprehensive service listings
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found
  4. Cookie consent is implemented with a recognized plugin
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content
  6. Security posture is moderate but lacks advanced headers and incident response info
  7. Use of modern WordPress ecosystem technologies and SEO plugins
  8. No WAF or blocking detected, site fully accessible
  9. No suspicious or malicious indicators found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using the Astra theme and Elementor page builder, supported by Yoast SEO for search optimization. It integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation clarity and professional design. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by multiple plugins and external scripts. No hosting provider details were found in the HTML content. The site uses a GDPR cookie consent plugin, indicating attention to privacy regulations. Technical risks include potential plugin vulnerabilities and lack of advanced security headers, which should be addressed to maintain operational integrity.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with enseco.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review enseco.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.