Skip to main content

Security report for enowe.com

ENOWE · Finance · France

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ENOWE is a French family investment structure founded in 2013, focused on supporting entrepreneurial projects with a strong commitment to positive social and environmental impact. The company positions itself as a responsible investor emphasizing innovation, growth, and excellence. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, targeting entrepreneurs and investors interested in sustainable and impactful ventures. The business model revolves around providing investment and support to projects aligned with their values of audacity, trust, benevolence, and rigor. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern performance optimizations such as WP Rocket and lazy loading. It uses Yoast SEO for search engine optimization and includes structured data for enhanced search presence. The site is mobile optimized and loads quickly, providing a good user experience. Hosting is provided by OVH sas, a reputable provider. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration but lacks advanced security headers and explicit security policies. No cookie consent mechanism or detailed privacy compliance statements are present, which may pose compliance risks under GDPR. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is publicly available. The WHOIS data is consistent with the business history, showing no privacy protection and a domain age appropriate for the company. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but could improve in privacy compliance and security transparency. Strategic recommendations include implementing cookie consent, publishing security policies, enabling DNSSEC, and adding security headers to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching enowe.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ENOWE operates as a niche family investment firm in France, focusing on entrepreneurial projects with social and environmental impact. Its competitive advantage lies in its commitment to responsible investment and support for innovation. The business model is centered on long-term value creation through growth and excellence. The target customers are entrepreneurs and investors aligned with impact investing principles. The company maintains a lean structure with no subsidiaries or parent company indicated. Its partnership ecosystem includes LinkedIn presence but no other partner domains were identified. The website content and structure suggest a stable, small-sized enterprise with a clear market positioning in impact-driven finance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. There is no public security policy or incident response contact information, which limits transparency and readiness. GDPR compliance is partial due to absence of cookie consent and detailed privacy policy statements. No known vulnerabilities or outdated libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be significantly improved by adopting best practices and enhancing privacy compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with GDPR requirements.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy with explicit GDPR compliance statements.
  3. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  4. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  5. Create and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve incident response transparency.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
ENOWE
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ENOWE
Description
Enowe est une structure d’investissement familial soutenant les projets entrepreneuriaux et qui est engagée à accroitre son impact positif, social et environnemental.
Key services
Investment support, Entrepreneurial project funding, Impact-driven investment
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery, WP Rocket (performance optimization), Font Awesome
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of modern fonts and lazy loading

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in French and professionally presented.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie consent mechanisms found, which may impact GDPR compliance.
  4. No visible security.txt or incident response information.
  5. No phone numbers or emails explicitly listed on the homepage or footer; contact is via contact page.
  6. Social media presence limited to LinkedIn.
  7. Website uses modern web technologies and performance optimizations.
  8. No advertising or tracking scripts detected.
  9. WHOIS data is consistent and domain is well established.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.1.9 with Yoast SEO plugin version 19.12, indicating a modern CMS environment with SEO optimization. It uses jQuery 3.6.1 and WP Rocket for performance enhancements including lazy loading of images and videos. Fonts are loaded efficiently with preloading and font-display swap. The site is mobile responsive with CSS media queries and flexible layouts. Hosting is via OVH sas, a reputable European provider. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. Performance is rated fast with good mobile optimization. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with ARIA roles and better keyboard navigation support. SEO is good with proper meta tags, Open Graph, Twitter cards, and structured data in JSON-LD format.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with enowe.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review enowe.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.