Skip to main content

Security report for enorm.media

ENORM Digital GmbH · Media · Germany

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ENORM Digital GmbH is a specialized internet agency based in Cologne, Germany, focusing on online advertising, digital media planning, and real-time advertising services. The company serves a diverse clientele including museums, medium-sized enterprises, publishers, associations, and financial institutions, particularly in the cultural and financial sectors. Their business model revolves around delivering targeted online campaigns, programmatic buying, and media optimization to increase brand visibility and lead generation. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with comprehensive service descriptions and client references, positioning ENORM as a trusted niche player in the German online advertising market. Technically, the website is built on the TYPO3 CMS platform and leverages modern web technologies such as jQuery, Gumby Framework, and Google Maps API. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices, although some accessibility features could be enhanced. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in loading speed and security header implementation. The presence of multiple external marketing and advertising tools, including Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel, indicates a mature digital marketing infrastructure. From a security perspective, the site uses SSL encryption as stated in its privacy policy, but lacks visible HTTP security headers and a dedicated security policy or incident response contact. Forms are implemented securely using POST methods, and no sensitive data is exposed in the HTML. Privacy compliance is well addressed with a comprehensive privacy statement aligned with GDPR requirements, although a cookie consent mechanism is absent. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could benefit from enhancements in header security and transparency. The domain WHOIS data is unavailable or protected, which is common for small digital agencies and justified for privacy reasons. Despite this, the website provides sufficient legal and contact information, client logos, and consistent branding to establish legitimacy and trustworthiness. No signs of malicious activity or suspicious patterns were detected. The overall risk assessment is low, with recommendations focusing on improving security headers, cookie consent, and incident response transparency to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching enorm.media

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
65
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention enorm.media, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for enorm.media right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ENORM Digital GmbH occupies a specialized niche in the German online advertising market, targeting cultural institutions, financial organizations, and medium-sized enterprises. Their competitive advantage lies in their expertise in real-time advertising and programmatic buying, enabling precise audience targeting and campaign optimization. Revenue streams likely derive from service contracts for campaign planning, execution, and media buying. The company maintains a strong partnership ecosystem with sister companies ENORM Digital and ENORM Design, enhancing their service portfolio. Growth indicators include a diverse client base with reputable institutions and continuous adoption of modern marketing technologies. Strategic observations suggest a focus on regional and sector-specific campaigns, leveraging deep domain knowledge in culture and finance to differentiate from generic digital agencies.

Security posture

The security maturity level of ENORM Digital GmbH's website is moderate. The use of SSL encryption and secure form handling are positive indicators. However, the absence of HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. There is no publicly available incident response or vulnerability disclosure policy, which limits transparency and preparedness. Privacy practices align well with GDPR, supported by a detailed privacy statement and IP anonymization in analytics. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The security culture appears cautious but could be improved by formalizing security policies and enhancing technical defenses.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Introduce a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply fully with EU cookie regulations and enhance user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and provide clear incident response contact information to improve trust and readiness.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and frameworks to avoid vulnerabilities from outdated components.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users and comply with accessibility standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
ENORM Digital GmbH
VAT number
DE 321304886
Registration number
HRB Köln 95537
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ENORM Digital GmbH
Description
ENORM MEDIA ist eine Internet-Agentur, spezialisiert auf die Planung, Durchführung und Optimierung von Online-Werbung, digitale Media-Planung und Real Time Advertising. Die Agentur arbeitet für Museen, Mittelständler, Verlage, Verbände, Sparkassen und börsennotierte Konzerne, vornehmlich aus Kunst, Kultur und Finanzen. Ziel ist es, Marken und Produkte im Internet regional Aufmerksamkeit und Reichweite zu verschaffen, Leads zu generieren und Kampagnen mit echtem Mehrwert zu realisieren.
Key services
Online-Werbung, Digitale Media-Planung, Real Time Advertising (RTA), Programmatic Buying, Banner-Formate Produktion, Landingpages und Microsites
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
TYPO3 CMS, jQuery, Gumby Framework, Owl Carousel, Google Maps API, HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript
Frameworks
TYPO3, Gumby
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • SSL encryption mentioned in privacy policy
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Contact forms use POST method

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
DoubleClick (Google), Facebook Exchange (FBX), InteractiveMedia, United Internet Media, Adform
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Campaign Monitor
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in German and professionally presented.
  3. Strong focus on online advertising, media planning, and real-time advertising.
  4. Multiple client logos from reputable institutions enhance trust.
  5. Contact information is complete and consistent across pages.
  6. No explicit privacy or security policy pages but detailed privacy and legal info in Impressum.
  7. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  8. Use of modern web technologies and CMS TYPO3.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response info found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on TYPO3 CMS, a robust and widely used content management system, indicating a stable infrastructure. The front-end uses jQuery and the Gumby framework for responsive design and UI components, alongside Owl Carousel for interactive elements. Google Maps API integration enhances location services. The site uses HTML5 and CSS3 standards, supporting modern browsers and mobile devices. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in load times and script optimization. No hosting provider details were found, limiting infrastructure analysis. The site demonstrates good SEO practices with meta tags and Open Graph data, supporting social media sharing and search engine visibility. Technical risks are low but could be mitigated by updating libraries and improving security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with enorm.media. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review enorm.media.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.