Skip to main content

Security report for enoe-energie.fr

ENOÉ, créateur d'énergie · Energy · France

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Enoé is a French renewable energy producer specializing in green and local energy solutions. The company manages the entire value chain from design to maintenance, positioning itself as a key player in the energy transition sector in France. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with a focus on sustainability and expertise in renewable energy production. The digital infrastructure is based on WordPress with SEO optimization via the All in One SEO plugin, and integrates marketing and analytics tools primarily from HubSpot and social media platforms. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS usage but lacks visible security headers and explicit privacy or cookie policies. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain trustworthiness, though the website content and structured data support legitimacy. Overall, the site is well-designed and user-friendly but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching enoe-energie.fr

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
50
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Enoé operates in the energy sector with a focus on renewable energy production in France. Their business model includes design, development, financing, construction, exploitation, and maintenance of renewable energy projects. The company targets a general audience interested in sustainable energy solutions and positions itself as a reputable French producer. The website's integration with HubSpot indicates a structured marketing approach, and social media presence on Facebook, YouTube, and LinkedIn supports brand visibility. The lack of WHOIS data and explicit contact information suggests areas for improvement in transparency. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the data provided.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, indicating basic encryption for data in transit. However, no security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are important for mitigating common web vulnerabilities. The site uses multiple third-party scripts for analytics and marketing, which could introduce risks if not regularly audited. There is no evidence of a vulnerability disclosure policy or incident response contact, which are best practices for security maturity. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires enhancements to meet higher standards and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  2. Publish clear and accessible privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts to minimize security risks.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve user experience for all users.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ENOÉ, créateur d'énergie
Description
Le groupe Enoé est un producteur français d’énergies vertes et locales, maîtrisant l’ensemble de la chaîne de valeur (design, développement, financement, construction, exploitation et maintenance).
Key services
design, development, financing, construction, exploitation, maintenance
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, JavaScript, CSS
Frameworks
All in One SEO
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by canonical URL and og:url https)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
HubSpot Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
HubSpot Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, HubSpot Analytics, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
HubSpot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is unusual and reduces trust.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage HTML.
  4. Multiple marketing and analytics scripts from HubSpot and social media platforms are present.
  5. Website uses WordPress CMS with All in One SEO plugin for SEO optimization.
  6. Content is professionally presented and focused on renewable energy production in France.
  7. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  8. Social media links to Facebook, YouTube, and LinkedIn are present in structured data.
  9. No security headers detected in the provided data; SSL status unknown but HTTPS URLs used.
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with PHP, JavaScript, and CSS technologies. It uses the All in One SEO plugin for metadata management and integrates marketing and analytics tools from HubSpot, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and Google Tag Manager. The site appears mobile-optimized with good design quality and navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by multiple external scripts. No hosting provider information was identified. The absence of security headers and incomplete WHOIS data represent technical risks. Opportunities exist to modernize security configurations and improve privacy compliance to reduce technical debt and enhance trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with enoe-energie.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review enoe-energie.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.