Skip to main content

Security report for engageadrian.com

Engage-Adrian S.L. · Finance · Spain

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

44/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Engage-Adrian S.L. is a small design agency specializing in integrated design and visual solutions, primarily serving the financial services and fintech sectors. Their website showcases a portfolio of projects and case studies, emphasizing user experience and visual design tailored to financial clients. The company positions itself as a niche provider with a focus on building trust through design in the financial industry. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Enfold theme, incorporating modern web technologies such as Google Fonts, jQuery, and Lottie animations. The site is mobile optimized and has moderate performance. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS with Google Analytics configured for IP anonymization and includes a cookie consent mechanism. However, it lacks explicit privacy policies, terms of service, security headers, and vulnerability disclosure information, which are important for compliance and trust. Overall, the website is professional and functional but could improve its privacy and security posture to enhance user trust and regulatory compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching engageadrian.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
50
Average
44

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the financial services design niche, targeting fintech and financial institutions with integrated design and visual solutions. Their business model is service-oriented, focusing on delivering tailored design projects that enhance user experience and brand activation. The presence of multiple case studies indicates a portfolio-driven approach to attract clients. The company maintains a professional online presence with clear contact details and social media links, supporting business credibility. No parent or subsidiary relationships are evident. The use of privacy protection in domain registration is typical for small agencies. The company leverages partnerships with financial clients but does not publicly disclose partnerships or certifications.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS is enforced with Google Analytics configured for privacy. A cookie consent mechanism is implemented, though no explicit cookie or privacy policies are found. The absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, limiting transparency in security management. No forms are present to assess input sanitization or secure data handling. Overall, the site meets minimal security standards but should enhance policies and technical controls to improve compliance and user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to meet GDPR and privacy regulations.
  2. Add terms of service to clarify user rights and responsibilities.
  3. Implement and configure security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Create and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and incident handling.
  5. Include incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  6. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users.
  7. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries for vulnerabilities and update accordingly.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Engage-Adrian S.L.
Description
Engage Adrian provides integrated design and visual solutions focused on creating engaging user experiences, primarily targeting the financial services sector. They showcase various case studies and projects related to fintech and financial services clients.
Key services
Integrated design, Visual solutions, Activation, User experience design
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Enfold theme, jQuery, Google Fonts, Google Analytics, Magnific Popup, Chart.js, Lottie animations
Frameworks
Avia Framework
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google Analytics anonymize IP enabled
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress site using the Enfold theme with a professional design.
  2. Content focuses on integrated design and visual solutions for financial services clients.
  3. Contact information includes a company domain email and phone number with Spanish country code.
  4. No explicit privacy policy, cookie policy, or terms of service pages found.
  5. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via class checks and scripts.
  6. Google Analytics is used with IP anonymization enabled.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  8. No security headers detected in the HTML content.
  9. No forms detected in the provided HTML content.
  10. Social media links include LinkedIn and Vimeo.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with the Enfold theme, leveraging a mature and widely supported CMS platform. The tech stack includes jQuery, Google Fonts, Google Analytics, and various Enfold shortcodes and scripts for UI components. Performance is moderate with lazy loading images and responsive design. The site uses standard SEO meta tags and structured data for content. However, no advanced performance optimizations like caching headers or CDN usage are evident from the HTML. The site lacks visible security headers and formal privacy/legal pages, indicating areas for technical and compliance improvement. The infrastructure appears stable but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with engageadrian.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review engageadrian.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.