Skip to main content

Security report for enerkomslovacko.cz

ENERKOM Slovácko, z.s. · Energy · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Email security, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ENERKOM Slovácko, z.s. is a small non-profit association focused on promoting community energy and sustainable development in the Slovácko region of the Czech Republic. The organization advocates for renewable energy sources, decentralization of energy production, and active member collaboration to improve quality of life and environmental conditions. Their key services include community energy initiatives, consulting, and partnerships. The website reflects a professional and regionally focused entity with clear contact information and GDPR-compliant privacy and cookie policies. Technically, the website employs a modern technology stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, Owl Carousel, Google reCAPTCHA v3, and the Nette PHP framework. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices and uses Google Fonts for typography. Hosting is managed through a Czech registrar with appropriate DNS configuration. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in accessibility and security headers. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and integrates Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms. Cookie consent is implemented with granular user controls and detailed disclosures. However, security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options are not detected, and no explicit security or incident response policies are published. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professionally maintained, with strong privacy compliance and a clear business purpose. Recommendations include enhancing HTTP security headers, publishing incident response contacts, and improving accessibility features to further strengthen security posture and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching enerkomslovacko.cz

This scan found 17 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
50
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
100
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ENERKOM Slovácko operates as a regional non-profit association dedicated to community energy solutions in the Czech Republic. Its market positioning is focused on local community engagement and sustainable energy development. The business model centers on advocacy, consulting, and partnership building rather than commercial sales. Revenue streams likely include membership fees, grants, and consulting services. The target audience includes local residents, municipalities, and stakeholders interested in renewable energy and sustainability. The organization demonstrates growth potential through active community involvement and partnerships. The website's partnership ecosystem includes legal advisors and web development firms, indicating a professional operational approach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and integration of Google reCAPTCHA v3 to mitigate spam and abuse. Cookie consent mechanisms comply with GDPR, offering users granular control over cookie categories. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or security contact information is published, limiting transparency in vulnerability reporting. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small non-profit but could be improved to meet higher standards and regulatory expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance browser security.
  2. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  3. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to identify and mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to comply with WCAG standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Consider creating and publishing a security.txt file to formalize vulnerability disclosure processes.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
ENERKOM Slovácko, z.s.
Registration number
L 28968/KSBR Krajský soud v Brně
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ENERKOM Slovácko, z.s.
Description
Jsme spolek zaměřený na podporu komunitní energetiky a udržitelného rozvoje v regionu Slovácka. Prosazujeme využití obnovitelných zdrojů, decentralizaci energetiky a aktivní spolupráci členů. Naším cílem je zlepšovat kvalitu života a životního prostředí prostřednictvím energetických řešení a partnerství.
Key services
Komunitní energetika, Poradenství, Spolupráce a partnerství
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.6.1, Bootstrap 5, Owl Carousel, Fancybox, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Google Fonts (Outfit), noUiSlider, Nette Framework (nette.ajax.js, netteForms.min.js)
Frameworks
Nette Framework
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 integration
  • Cookie consent management with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel (commented out), Seznam Retargeting (commented out), Smartlook (commented out), Smartsupp (commented out)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed non-profit community energy association site.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy policy mechanisms are implemented.
  3. No terms of service page found.
  4. Contact information is complete and includes email, phone, physical address, and contact form.
  5. Security practices are good but could be improved with additional HTTP headers and explicit security policies.
  6. No evidence of malicious or suspicious content.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks.
  8. Social media presence limited to LinkedIn.
  9. Cookie consent includes detailed categories and user control.
  10. Google reCAPTCHA v3 is used for spam protection on forms.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack featuring jQuery 3.6.1, Bootstrap 5, Owl Carousel, Fancybox, and Google reCAPTCHA v3, integrated within a Nette PHP framework environment. It uses Google Fonts for typography and includes noUiSlider for UI components. The site is hosted with a Czech registrar and uses forpsi.net and forpsi.it name servers. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO meta tags. Accessibility is basic and could be improved. The site uses asynchronous loading for scripts and includes a cookie consent mechanism with detailed user controls. There is no evidence of a commercial CMS; the site appears custom-built or based on Nette CMS. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security headers and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with enerkomslovacko.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review enerkomslovacko.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.